Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 9348
SECOND DIVSION Docket No. 9283
2-N&W-SM-'82
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Rodney E. Dennis when award was rendered.
( Sheet Metal Workers' International Association
Parties to Dispute:
( Norfolk and Western Railway Company

Dispute: Claim of Employer





Findings

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employer involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 193+.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant, 0. Burkey, a Sheetmetal Worker in Carrier's Brewster Locomotive Shop was bypassed for an overtime assignment. On October 18, 1979, the Organization filed a claim on behalf of Burkey requesting eight hours of pay at the punitive rate. The Organization alleges that Carrier, by its action of assigning the overtime to other than Claimant, violated Rule 3 of the Schedule Agreement. That Rule reads as follows:






Form 1 Award No. 9308
Page 2 Docket No. 9283
2-N&W-SM-'82
low
the October 18 overtime work. Rule 3 does not require that overtime be assigned
on a day-to-day basis or on a first-in first-out basis, but that it be equitably
assigned over a period of tune.

This Board has rendered a denial award in Award No. 9305 on the identical issue with the same parties involved here. Our reasoning in that case applies equally as well to this case.






                            By Order of Second Division


Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By
emarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 22nd day of September, 1982.