Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 9408
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9344
2-NRPC-FO-'83
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Edward Z, Suntrup when award was rendered.
( International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers
Parties to Dispute:
( National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Dispute: Claim of Employee:













Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employs or employee involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employs within the meaning of the Railway labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant, Mr. Anthony Burkley, entered the service of the Carrier on January 9, 1978 and at the time of the alleged incident under question held the position of laborer at Carrier's Brighton Park Turbo Facility in Chicago, Illinois. On July 4, 1979 Claimant received notice to appear at an investigative hearing on July 10, 1979. He was charged with violation of Carrier Rules of Conduct "C", "I" and "J". These Rules state the following:




F orm 1 Page 2

Award No. 9+08
Docket No. 9344
2-NRPC-FO-183

wise vicious, or who do not conduct themselves in such a manner that the Company will not be subjected to criticism and loss of good will."

"J. Courteous conduct is required of all employees in their dealing with the public, their subordinates and each other. Boisterous, profane or vulgar language is forbidden. Violence, fighting, horseplay, threatening or interferring with other employees or while on duty is prohibited."

After request for postponement by Claimant, the hearing was held on July 20, 1979· On July 27, 1979 Claimant was notified by Carrier that he had been found guilty as charged and was being dismissed from service effective July 28, 1979. In subsequent appeal on property the charge of violation of Rule C was dropped because of lack of evidence.

A review of the transcript of the hearing shows that sufficient substantial evidence of probative value is present to warrant the conclusion that Claimant was in violation of Rules I and J of Carrier Rules of Conduct. This, plus Claimant's prior discipline record, which the National Railroad Adjustment Board has held can be equitably used in assessing penalties (Second Division Awards 3+30 and 5182 inter alia) leads this Board to conclude that it should not disturb Carrier determination in the present case.

A W A R D

Claim denied.

Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

NATIONAL RAIIRQAD ADJUSTMNT BOARD

By Order of Second Division


By _


Dated t Chicago, Illinois, this 2nd day of March, 1983.