For m 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 9422
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9+17
2-CR-MA-183
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee James F. Scearce when award was rendered.
( International Association of Machinists and
Parties to Dispute: ( Aerospace Workers



Dispute: Claim of Employee:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employs or employee involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employs within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act; as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



This case involves two (2) separate claims on behalf of four (4) individual Claimants for pay under Rule 2-A-4 concehrning their movement from duties or their regular assignment to other work which the Organization asserts was not comprehended in the regular assignment. The Carrier raises a procedural objection over the movement of this case to this Board for review.

This Board disposes of this dispute in favor of the Claimants. We find the: procedural argument falls short of a sufficient showing to bar consideration of the merits and we conclude that the work involved was not duties comprehended in the Claimants' regular duties. Compensation shall be in accordance with Rule 2-A-4(b).




Form 1
Page 2

Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By 'w


Dat at Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of March, 1983.

Award No. 9422
Docket No. 9kI7
2-CR-MA-' 83

NAmoNAZ RAIZROAD ADJUSTMENT BQM

By Order of Second Division