Form 1 NATIONAL RAIIROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 9423
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9123
2-BN-CM-183
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee James F. Scesrce when award was rendered.
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
Parties to Dispute: ( and Canada




Dispute: Claim of Employee:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employer involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 193+.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



This claim arises over work performed by Claimants in conjunction with repairs to a broken train line, such work coming on a car several days after a rerailme;nt of a wreck had occurred, including the car in question. The Organization attempts to apply Rule 7 - Emergency Roadwork (c) which governs the rate of pay for wrec:kiig service employes while performing work attendant to derailment/rerailment activities.

We find no basis to conclude the work of the Claimants in this case was covered by such Rule; essentially we adopt the Carrier's rationale that the Claimants were engaged in normal duties of the craft. The fact that the broken line may have resulted from the derailment does not make it work of a wrecking crew her- se. The record is clear enough that, in this case, this specific item of work was not compensable under this Rule.




Form 1
Page 2

Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By
~sesuarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

~D'ated ~at Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of March, 1983.

Award No. 9423
Docket No. 9423
2-BN-CM-183

NATIONAL RAIZR.oAD ADJUSTNErrr BOARD

By Order of Second Division