Form 1 NATIONAL RAIIROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 9451
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9442-Fw8:D-cm-'
83
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee James F. Scearce when award was rendered.
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
Parties to Dispute: ( and Canada
~ Fort Worth and Denver Railway Company
Dispute: Claim of Employee:
1. That the Fort Worth and Denver Railway Company violated the controlling
agreement at Childress, Texas, when they denied Carman G. R. Ralston
the work assignment as Car Inspector assigned by bulletin "assignment
notice No. 1E-692" dated November 28, 1980.
2. That accordingly, the Fort Worth and Denver Railway Company be ordered
to compensate Carman Ralston in the amount of eight
(8)
hours pay at
the straight time rate for December
6, 7,
11 and 12, 1980.
Findings;
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant, who was classified as a Carman's Helper and assigned to Amarillo,
Texas, was working as an upgraded Carman at Childress, Texas, when in November of
1980 a vacancy for a Relief Car Inspector occurred at Amarillo. The Inspector
position had scheduled rest days of Thursdays and Fridays. No journeyman Carman
bid the assignment but the Claimant did and was awarded such bid on November 28,
1980. The Claimant was released from his assigned job on Friday, December 12,
1980.
The claim herein goes to dates of December
6
and
7,
1980 -- which were
regular rest days on the work to which he was assigned at Childress, and December
11 and 12, 1980 -- regular rest days for the Inspector position at Amarillo which
the Claimant actually worked at Childress. He did not claim all other regularly
schedule work days for the Inspector position from the November 28, 1980 award
until his release on December 12,
1980.
It is noted that the work locations
were some 100 miles apart.
It is well-established that a Carrier is entitled to ensure an orderly
transition of assignments in
the absence
of a specific Rule which sets such
Form 1
Award No. 9451
Page 2 2cWgDNCM-'
835
time limits; the delay in such
assignment
here is not unreasonable. It is also
noted that the claim is punitive in nature in part, given the fact that the
grievant was under pay during two dates being demanded here. There is no
merfL
to
the
claim.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Acting
Executive
Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By
~~ .ts.
Rosemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 20th day of April, 1983.