Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 9479
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9622
2-C&Nw-FO-'83
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Barbara W. Doering when award was rendered.



Parties to Dispute: ~ Chicago and North Western Transportation Company

Dispute: Claim of Employes:













Findings

The Second Divisipn of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Based upon the written complaints of two nurses with regard to Claimant's abusive and demeaning conduct towards them during a routine physical on July 24, 1981, a hearing was called and conducted on the charge of "conduct unbecoming an employe and using vulgar, profane and indecent language at approximately 11:45 a.m., July 24, 1981 in the office of the Carrier's Medical Director."

The Organization alleges that Claimant was denied due process in this investigatory hearing because his representative was not permitted to demand a general recital of the events from the two nurses. The Board finds, however, that due process was not abridged where it was made clear to Claimant's representative that he could ask specific questions about any of the points contained in the written statements which the nurses attested to.
F orm 1 Page 2

Award No. 9479

Docket No. 9622

2-C&NW-FO-'83


While the Organization is correct that Claimant's language was not shown to be profane, it was vulgar and indecent in the context of his actions. The Board agrees with the Carrier that vulgar and demeaning language and conduct towards employes cannot be condoned. There was no allegation that the nurses in any way provoked Claimant's conduct, nor does his short (9 months) service provide any reason for mitigation. The Board therefore concludes that the seriousness of the infraction and lack of mitigating circumstances justify denial of the claim.

A W A R D

Claim denied.

Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

BY ~



Dated t Chicago, Illinois, this 4th day of May, 1983.

NATIONAL RAIIROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

By Order of Second Division