Form 1 NATIONAL RAIIROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 9482
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9145-T
2-SPT-SM-183
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
( Sheet Metal Workers International Association
Parties to Dispute:
( Southern Pacific Transportation Company

Dispute: Claim of Employes:



(2) That any and all employes of the Sheet Metal Workers Craft adversely
affected as result of the arbitrary abolishment of these positions
and replacement of one position by employee of other craft, who would
therefore be entitled to reparation as result of this discriminatory act and
unfair labor practice by Carrier, be afforded such reparation by Carrier.
Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



This dispute concerns the abolishment of two Sheet Metal Workers' positions in a group project involving employes of several crafts. The work consisted of providing a data base for computerization of information concerning materials and manpower required in repair work. The Sheet Metal Workers positions were abolished on May 13, 1980. At about the same time, an additional employe of the Machinist craft was added to the group.

The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers was notified as having possible third party interest and filed a response.

The Organization has failed to show any evidence that work of the Sheet Metal Workers craft was continued in the group project following the abolishment of the Sheet Metal Workers positions. The employes involved in the job abolishments were placed elsewhere in accordance with the scheduled agreement. Absent a showing of work properly belonging to Sheet Metal Workers craft being performed by others, there is no support for the claim.
Form 1 Award No. 9482
Page 2 Docket No. 9145-T
2-SPT-SM-'83

With this finding, it is unnecessary for the Board to review the various procedural arguments raised by the Carrier as to the propriety of the claim as brought to the Board.






                            By Order of Second Division


Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By ~Z

      osemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant


Dat at Chicago, Illinois, this 11th day of May, 1983.