Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ALVUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 9779
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9535
2-CR-FO-'84
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Livid P. Traomey when award was rendered.
( International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers
Parties to Dispute:
( Consolidated Rail Corporation
Dispute: Claim of anployes:
1. That, in violation of the current agreement, Laborer Albert E. Lyons was
unjustly dismissed from service of the Carrier following trial held on September
18, 1980.
2. That, accordingly, the Carrier be ordered to make the aforementioned
Albert E. Lyons whole by restoring him to Carrier's service, with seniority
rights unimpaired, made whole for all vacation rights, holidays, sick leave
benefits, and all other benefits that are a condition of employment unimpaired,
and compensated for all lost time plus ten [ZO%J percent interest annually on .a11
lost wages, also reimbursement far all losses sustained account of coverage under
health and welfare and life insurance agreements during the time he has been held
out of service.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and a1.1
the evidence finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employer involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor .Act
as approved June 21 , 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right o f appearance at hearing thereon.
The Claimant, Mr. A. E. Lyons, was removed from service as a Laborer at the
Carrier's Collingwood Diesel Terminal at approximately 8:00 P.M. on August 29,
1980. Mr. Lyons was later charged with a violation of Conrail Safety Rule 4002
and Rule "G" relating to 8:00 P.M. on August 29, 1980. A trial was held on
September 18, 1980; and a notice of discipline dated October 6, 1980 informed Mr.
Lyons that he was dismissed from the service of the Carrier as a result of having
been found responsible for the violation of Safety Rule 4002 and Rule "G" on the
evening of August 29, 1980.
We have considered the contentions o f the Organization set forth in its
Submission to the Board, and we are compelled to find that they are without merit.
Form 1 Award No. 9779
Page 2 Docket No. 9535
2-CR-FO-184
Substantial evidence of record supports the Carrier's finding of
responsibility for violation of Conrail Safety Rule 4002 and Rule "G". The
evidence shows that at approximately 8:00 P. M. on August 29, 1980, Mr. Lyons was
one of six employes found in the P-I-A downstairs locker room-bathroom by three
Carrier officials who were acting on a prior report that there was drinking going
on in the washrooms. A trash can in the washroom had approximately twenty empty
beer cans in it. While three of the individuals were observed holding beer cans
in their hands, Mr. Lyons was not so observed holding a beer can in his hand nor
was he observed actually drinking beer. However, Shop Superintendent C. Waller
testified that he smelled alcohol on the person o f Mr. Lyons; and that there was
no doubt that the smell of alcohol was coming from Mr. Lyons breath. Shop
Superintendent Gustavson testified that Mr. Lyons' breath smelled that he had
just consumed beer, and that Mr. Lyons eyes were glassy. Assistant Shop Manager
Haas testified that he smelled alcohol on Mr. Lyons' breath, and that his eyes
appeared glazed. This Board has on numerous occasions held that observations of
witnesses as to what they smelled and observed concerning sobriety or the consumption
of alcoholic beverages is probative evidence. In the instant case three witnesses
testified that Mr. Lyons' breath smelled of alcohol with two witnesses testifying
that Mr. Lyons' eyes were glassy or glazed. This is substantial evidence of
record to support the Carrier's finding of responsibility for the rules violations.''r`
Rule "G" is a dismissal offense. Mr. Lyons had approximately four years of service
at the time of his dismissal. We cannot find that the discipline of dismissal
was arbitrary, capricious, unjust or excessive.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
ATTEST:
Nanc
V~
ver - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 1st day o f February, 1984 -