Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No.9806
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9211
2-BN-CM-' 84
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Martin F. Scheinman when award was rendered.
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
( and Canada
Parties to Dispute:
( Burlington Northern Railroad Company

Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the, meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant, Robert Malisheski, at the time this dispute arose, was employed as a Carman Mechanic at St. Cloud, Minnesota. On February 28, 1980, one of the supervisors at the St. Cloud Shop carried component parts to other mechanics to expedite the repairing of cars. Specifically, the supervisor carried some coupler shims to a point in the shop where a freight car in need of the shims was being repaired.

The Organization claims that the work performed by the supervisor belongs exclusively to carmen under the terms of Rules 27(a) and 83. It asks that Claimant be paid four hours at the straight time rate for February 28, 1980.




\\

\,

Form 1 Award No. 9806
Page 2 Docket No. 9211
2-BN-CM-'84
Rule 83 Classification of Work:



The language of these rules cannot be viewed, in any way, as reserving the work in question to Claimant or to members of the carmen craft. Therefore, the Organization was unable to shoulder their burden.






                            By Order of Second Division


Attest:
        Nancy. fiver - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 7th day of March, 1984.