f









































Form 1 Award No. 9903
Page 2 Docket No. 10006
2-SP-SMW-'84
"You are hereby notified to be present at the Office of the
Plant Manager, 201 N. Piedras Street, El Paso, Texas, at 9:00 AM,
Monday, December 14, 1981, for formal hearing to develop the facts
and place responsibility, if any, in connection with your allegedly
striking Roundhouse Foreman F. Morales with your fist while on duty at
approximately 5:30 AM, December 5, 1981, in the Mechanical Department:
employees' locker room.
You are hereby charged with responsibility which may involve violation
of Rule 801, reading as follows:
'Employes will not be retained in the service who are
careless of the safety of themselves or others,
insubordinate, dishonest, immoral, quarrelsome or
otherwise vicious, or who conduct themselves in a manner
which csv uld subject the railroad to criticism.
Any act o f hostility, misconduct or willful disregard or
negligence affecting the interest of the Company is
sufficient cause for dismissal and must be reported.'













The hearing was conducted as scheduled, and a copy of the transcript has been made a part o f the record. We consider the investigation, or hearing, to have been conducted in a fair manner. It is well settled that if exceptions are to be taken as to the manner in which an investigation is conducted, such exceptions must be taken during the course of the investigation; otherwise, they are deemed waived. There was an objection by claimant's representative to part of the statement of
Form 1 Award No. 9903

Page 3 Docket No.10006
2-SP-SMW-184

Laborer R. D. Becomo being rejected by the hearing officer, but we not consider such objection to be of sufficient significance to invalidate the proceedings. Becamo had testified as to his alleged encounters with Roundhouse Foreman Morales, but stated that his knowledge of the incident between claimant and the Roundhouse Foreman was "Just rumors that I have heard around." We see nothing improper in excusing him as a witness at that time.

There sere no witnesses to the alleged striking incident between the claimant and the Roundhouse Foreman. In the investigation the statements of the two were in conflict on most important points. The Carrier, as the trier of the facts, chose to believe the testimony of the Roundhouse Foreman rather than that of claimant.

Many awards o f this Board have adhered to the principle that the Board will not weigh evidence, attempt to resolve conflicts therein, or pass upon the credibility of witnesses. Such functions are reserved to the hearing officer. The Board may not reverse the Carrier's detemnination merely because of conflicts in testimony. The evidence in the present case was sufficient to justify the discipline imposed by the Carrier.







ATTEST:
                    i

      Nancy J. o7f'- Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 9th day of May, 1984