Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 10012
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 10015-T
2-N&W-SM-'84
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee W. J. Peck when award was rendered.
( Sheet Metal Workers' International Association
Parties to Dispute:
( Norfolk and Western Railway Company

Dispute: Claim of Employes:









Findings:

'The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The Carrier maintains a large freight car and locomotive repair facility at Roanoke, Virginia. Because of Environmental Protection Agency restrictions it was necessary for the Carrier to install some air pollution prevention equipment called Emission Control Bag Houses in which air is filtered through some felt like material apparently similar to but much larger than the filter bag in a vacuum cleaner. Some time in May of 1981 it was necessary for these filters to be changed, which work was performed on dates of May 22, 23, and 26, by laborers who are represented by the International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers. The Sheet Metal Workers International Association contend that their members should have performed the work. Both parties contend that the work is covered by their classification of work rule and/or scope rules and that they have historically performed it. This is the genesis of the dispute.

The Carrier contends that the work is not covered by either classification of work rule and/or scope rules, and while agreeing that members of both organizations have at times performed the work, Carrier contends that neither of the parties have performed it enough to claim exclusive jurisdiction.
Form 1 Award No. 10012
Page 2 Docket No. 10015-T
2-N&W-SM-'84













Neither the Sheet Metal Workers or the Firemen and Oilers have cited any specific provisions in the above two (2) cited classifications of work rule and/or scope rules which covers the work involved in this dispute and if there is any such coverage it is not apparent to this neutral. We must agree with the Carrier that the work of changing out these filters is not covered by either of the two (2) previously cited work rules.
Form 1 Award No. 10012
Page 3 Docket No. 10015-T
2-N&W-SM- ' 84

Both the Sheet Metal Workers and the Firemen and Oilers contend that historically their members have performed this work (the Firemen and Oilers concede that the time period was relatively short) other than bare assertions neither side presents any proof at a11. The Carrier asserts that the change outs were as follows:


Foundry South side of building By laborers for the first time in
May, 1981
Section 20 Building Only once by Laborers
New Car Line, Freight car shop Many times by Laborers
Foundry cleaning shop Once by Sheet Metal Workers

We do not believe that the record of past practice as shown in this case is sufficient to establish a clear cut showing of exclusive jurisdiction for either party, however the Firemen and Oilers' does appear to have the stronger claim. We will deny the claim.






                            By Order of Second Division


Attest : ,..r
Nancy J ~ er - Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this, 1st day of August 1984.