Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 10081
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9727
2-BN-CM-184
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert W. McAllister when award was rendered.
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
( and Canada
Parties to Dispute:
( Burlington Northern Railroad Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That the Burlington Northern, Inc. violated Rules 7, 26, 83 and 86 of
our Current Agreement when they used Hulcher Wrecking Service
employees to rebuild trucks and rerail cars at Aylmer, North Dakota.
2. That accordingly, the Burlington Northern, Inc. be ordered to
compensate Dilworth, Minnesota Wrecking crew Carmen O. V. Dawson, R.
C. Cowie, L. Bernier, E. M. Olson, J. W. Zeller and D. M. Stulz in
the amount of thirty-six (36) hours each at the time and one-half
(1.5) rate for the days of March 28, 29 and 30, 1981.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
On March 25, 1981, thirty-two cars derailed at Aylmer, North Dakota. The
Carrier's Dilworth and Minot wrecking derricks and assigned crews were
dispatched to the derailment site. These crews cleared twenty-six of the cars
from the main line when units from the Hulcher Wrecking Service arrived, and
all three crews cleared the
remaining cars
. At approximately 7:00 A.M., the
main line was cleared, and the Dilworth wrecking crew was released and sent
back to its home station arriving at 12:30 A.M. Hulcher and the Minot wrecking
crews worked together rebuilding trucks and rerailing cars until 12:01 P. M.,
March 30, 1981, at which time Hulcher was released. This claim is for the time
spent by Hulcher rebuilding trucks and rerailing cars after the Dilworth crew
was released.
The Organization submits the Carrier violated the terms of the controlling
Agreement when it released the Dilworth crew and used other than carmen to
rebuild trucks and perform wrecking service. This work has been historically
preserved to the carmen, and the Organization points out the Carrier has never
disputed the fact that Hulcher groundsmen assisted the Minot wrecking crew in
rebuilding trucks and making associated repairs. The Organization asserts
that, when a wrecking crew has been called, the work belongs to the carmen.
Form 1 Award No. 10081
Page 2 Docket No. 9727
2-BN-CM-184
After the main line was cleared, the Carrier had the damaged cars rerailed
to be brought in for repairs. The Carrier, in denying this claim, contended
Hulcher was used because it had the "cats" to get the equipment to the right of
way whereas the Dilworth derrick can only operate within the reach of the boom.
While the Organization suggested in its submission that the Dilworth derrick
could have wenched the cars close to the track, this assertion was not raised
on the property. The Carrier has shown a necessity for its decision to use the
Hulcher equipment in working with the Carrier's Minot derrick. Correspondingly,,
this Board is unable to find probative evidence necessary to sustain this
claim.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: ,
Nancy J. !Ded'er - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of September 1984.