Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 10134
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9648-T
2-N&W-CM-'84
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States and Canada
Parties to Dispute:
( Norfolk and Western Railway Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That the Norfolk and Western Railway Company violated the Current
Agreement of January 1, 1943, (formerly Virginian) as subsequently
amended, when on July 23 and 24, 1980, they failed to call the regularly
assigned Wreck Crew to perform wrecking service near Elmore-Mullens
Terminal WV, a point of the Norfolk and Western Railway Company, but
instead called two (2) Employes from another Craft, the Maintenance
of Way (M of W), including one (1) Substitute Derrick Wreck Car.
Furthermore, Carrier permitted one (1) of the M of W Employees to
operate the Clamshell, which is converted into a Substitute Derrick
Wreck Car by removing cotter key and bolt from boom, including the
bucket, attaching hooks) and various other attachments to perform
wrecking Service.
2. That the Norfolk and Western Railway Company failed to call one (1)
Carman in place of the regularly assigned member of the regularly
assigned member (sic) of the Wreck Crew who was on vacation and a
Wreck Engineer to operate the Substitute Wreck Car.
3. That the Norfolk and Western Railway Company did violate the rules of
the Current Agreement, particularly, Rules Nos. 113 and 114, including
Article VII of the December 4, 1975 Agreement.
4. Prior to the December 4, 1975 Agreement, the Wreck Crew consisted of
two (2) Carmen, one (I) Helper Carman as Groundman, and (1) Carman
Derrick Engineer.
5. That because of such violations and capricious actions, the Norfolk
and Western Railway Company be order (sic) to compensate Carmen R. D.
Cook, fifteen (15) hours at the applicable time and one-half rate of
pay, and Carman R. G. Hall eight (8l hours at the applicable time and
one-half rate of pay, and seven (7) hours at the applicable double
time rate of pay, account of loss suffered due to such violations,
and restore the same number of regularly assigned members of the
Wreck Crew as was in effect December 4, 1975.
Form 1 Award No. 10134
Page 2 Docket No. 9648-T
2-N&W-CM- ' 84
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, a third party at interest,
was advised of the dispute, but limited its response to stating that the dispute
was between the Carrier and the Carmen.
As background, there is no dispute to the Organization's contention that
prior to December 1, 1975 the Carrier maintained a wreck crew at Elmore, West
Virginia, including four employees of the Carmen's craft. As stated by the
Organization, "In May, 1979, Carrier abolished and/or removed the Derrick Wreck
Car, including the abolishment of all regularly assigned members of the Wreck
Crew and the Derrick Engineer's job in June, 1979."
Further, there is no dispute that in July 1979, two Carmen and a Carmen
Helper were assigned to a Hoesch Wreck Truck, used in conjunction with wrecking
services.
A derailment of seven loaded coal hoppers occurred on July 23, 1980 at
Itmann, West Virginia. The Hoesch wreck truck was dispatched, including a
Wreckmaster, one Carmen and one Helper, with two Laborers. In addition, the
Carrier dispatched a "Clamshell", operated by two Maintenance of Way employees.
The purpose of the Clamshell was, according to the Carrier, "to unload or transfer
the coal from the derailed cars to facilitate the efficient and safe rerailing
of these cars". The Organization characterizes the Clamshell as a "substitute
wrecking derrick" capable of assisting in rerailing work and claims that carmen
should have been utilized in such wrecking service work rather than Maintenance
of Way employees. .
Rules relevant to the dispute are as follows:
"CLASSIFICATION OF WORK
Rule No. 110
"Carmen's work shall consist of building, maintaining,
painting, upholstering and
inspecting all
passenger and
freight cars, both wood and steel, planing mill, cabinet
and bench carpenter work, pattern and flask making and all
other carpenter work in shops and yards (except work
generally recognized as bridge and building department
work); carmen's work in building and repairing motor cars,
lever cars, hand cars and station trucks (except necessary
Form 1 Award No. 10134
Page 3 Docket No. 9648-T
2-N&W-CM-'84
"repairs made by Maintenance of Way and Signal employees
while such equipment is in their charge); building, repair
ing, removing and applying wooden locomotive cabs, pilots,
pilot beams,
running boards,
foot and headlight boards;
tender frames and trucks, pipe and inspection work in
connection with air brake equipment on freight cars;
applying patented metal roofing; operating rivet heaters
in regular rivet gangs; operating bending machines doing
shaping and forming; work done with hand forges and heating
torches in
connection with
carmen's work; painting,
varnishing, surfacing, decorating, lettering, cutting of
stencils and removing paint on passenger and caboose cars
(not including use of sand-blast machines or removing
vats); and all other work generally recognized as painter's
work under the supervision of the Locomotive and Car
Departments, except the application of blacking to fire
and smoke boxes of locomotives in engine houses; joint car
inspectors, car inspectors, safety appliance and train
repairers, wreck derrick engineers and locomotive crane
engineers in shop yards (not to include cranes or derricks
assigned to other than Mechanical Department); oxyacetylene,
thermit and electric welding on work generally recognized
as carmen's work, and all other work generally recognized
as carmen's work.
Note: Present practice of dismantling freight cars and
the operation of machines fabricating car material used in
building and repairing cars will be continued."
"WRECKING CREWS
Rule No. 113
Sufficient carmen will be assigned to regularly
assigned wrecking crews to perform such work as is
generally recognized as carmen's work where sufficient
men are available and will be paid for such service
tender Rule No. 9. Meals and lodging will be provided
by the Company while wrecking crews are on duty in
wrecking service.
Rule No. 114
When wrecking crews are called for wrecks or derailments outside of yard limits, the regularly assigned
crew will accompany the outfit. For wrecks or derailments within yard limits, sufficient carmen will be
called to perform the work."
Form 1 Award No. 10134
Page 4 Docket No. 9648-r
2-N&W-CM-'84
"ARTICLE VII - WRECKING SERVICE
1. When pursuant to rules or practices, a carrier
utilizes the equipment of a contractor (with or without
forces) for the performance of wrecking service, a
sufficient number of the carrier's assigned wrecking
crew, if reasonably accessible to the wreck, will be
called (with or without the carrier's wrecking equip
ment and its operators) to work with the contractor. The
contractor's ground forces will not be used, however,
unless all available and reasonably accessible members
of the assigned wrecking crew are called. The number
of employees assigned to the carrier's wrecking crew
for purposes of this rule will be the number assigned
as of the date of this Agreement
..."
To the degree that the organization relies on Article VII, such reliance
is i11-founded, since the Carrier did not utilize the equipment of a contractor.
As to Rule 114, only the first sentence applies here, since the derailment was
outside yard limits. This calls for employing the "regularly assigned crew" in
instances "when wrecking crews are called". As noted above, the Carrier removed
the Derrick Wreck Car and abolished the wreck Crew in relation to that equipment
in May 1979. There _is now a crew assigned to the Hoesch Wreck Truck, and the
"regularly assigned crew" was called to "accompany the outfit".
Question remains, therefore,
concerning the
use of the Clamshell car with
other than Carmen as crew. There is no dispute that the use of the Clamshell
for other than wreck purposes is regularly and properly assigned to Maintenance
of Way employees. Does its use in connection with rerailing outside yard limits
bring it under the control of Carmen?
The Board finds no basis to support this. The Carmen's Classification of
Work rule includes the phrase (although in a reference to engineers in shop
yards) "(not to include cranes or derricks assigned to other than Mechanical
Department)". Under the particular circumstances here, the Organization has
not established by rule or practice any exclusive right of Carmen to wrecking
service outside yard limits -- certainly not to the extent of taking over the
Clamshell to which Maintenance of Way employees are normally assigned.
It follows that there is no basis to require the Carrier to "restore the
same number of the regularly assigned members of the wreck crew as was in
effect December 4, 1975". Any claim as to this should have been made, if at
a11, in a timely fashion at the time of the crew abolishment.
In this dispute, the organization places reliance on Award No. 7926, in
which the award sustained the claim of a wrecking crew even absent a "wreck
outfit". That award, however, is not of precedential value here. First, in
Award No. 7926, an outside contractor was involved, bringing into play rule
provisions not otherwise applicable.
Form 1 Award No. 10134
Page 5 Docket No. 9648-T
2-N&W-CM-'84
Second, and directly in point, Award No. 7926 states:
"...nevertheless, there still remains the fact that
wreck crew assignments are bulletined positions and as
such are subject to the abolishment procedures set forth
in Article III, Rule 24(h) of the June 5, 1962 National
Agreement. The Board notes that such wrecking crew
positions apparently were never formally abolished at
Washington, Indiana in accordance with Article III, Rule
24(h) either at the time the derrick was reassigned in
1972 nor any time subsequent to the removal of the
derrick. This failure to so abolish the wrecking crew
positions, the Board believes, accounts in some substantial part for the confusion on the part of two minor
Carrier officials stationed in Washington, Indiana in
believing that a regularly assigned wrecking crew did
exist at Washington, Indiana as per their letters to the
Organization under dates of June 2, and July 29, 1976
respectively. The Board agrees with Carrier's position
that said letters are in no way binding on the Carrier,
but the Board does lend some significance to the fact that
a wrecking crew was presumed to have existed four years
after the removal of the derrick from the property, notwithstanding the fact, that vacated wrecking crew positions due to employee attrition were never subsequently
filled..."
In the claim under review here, there not only was an abolishment of the
wreck crew in 1979, but also the establishment of a new Hoesch Wreck Truck
crew, consisting of Carmen, which was employed in this situation. In the
narrow circumstances involved here, there is no showing that Carmen jurisdiction
extends to the use of the Clamshell operated in normal fashion by Maintenance
of Way employees.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUST14ENT BOARD
,7
By Order of Second Division
r
Attest:
'~
Nancy J. ver - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of October 1984.