Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 10198
SECOND DIVISION Locket No. 10135
2-SP-EW-184
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Eckehard Muessig when award was rendered.
( International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Parties to Dispute:
( Southern Pacific Transportation Company
( Eastern Lines
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That the Southern Pacific transportation Company (Eastern Lines) improperly
discharged Radio Equipment Installer
K. P.
Blount from service on July 23, 1982 in
violation of the current agreement.
2. That accordingly the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Eastern
Lines) be ordered to restore Mr.
K. P.
Blount to service as a Radio Equipment:
Installer with all seniority rights and fringe benefits unimpaired and compensate
him eight (8) hours each day at the pro rata rate of pay including eighteen percent
(18%) interest compounded each month commencing July 23, 1982 and
continuing
until the date he is restored to service, both dates inclusive.
FINDINGS: °
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning. of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
This dispute comes about as a result of the Carrier's finding that the
Claimant had absented himself from duty without proper authority and that, as a
consequence, he should be discharged from its services on July 23, 1982.
Leading to the Carrier's action of July 1982 were two earlier Second Division
Awards. Award 8682 of April 15, 1981 ruled that the Claimant, the same as
herein, was unjustly dismissed from service following a series of events related
to his qualification for a position of Radio Equipment Installer. However, the
neutral sitting for Award 8682 was not aware that Award 8550 had been issued on
December 17, 1980. The events leading to that earlier award encompassed most
of the relevant issues ruled upon in Award 8682. However, Award 8550 had found
the Claimant not qualified for the position of Radio Equipment Installer.
Form 1 Award No. 10198
Page 2 Docket No. 10135
2-SP-EW-184
Following a series of subsequent events as described in the record,
the dispute ultimately came before a U. S. District Court. The Court remanded
Award No. 8682 to the National Railroad Adjustment Board for clarification,
stating in pertinent part:
"However, this Court is unable to determine whether defendant is
within compliance with the various awards of the Board for the reason
that those awards appear to be
inconsistent. Award
No. 8682, issued
subsequent to Award No. 8550, reaches a different conclusion on the
March 1979 disqualification of employee Kenneth Blount from position
No. 37. However, the second award fails to reconcile the earlier
result. It is appropriate where clarification is required to remand
to the Board so that it may resolve
inconsistencies...
Since this Court has determined for the reasons stated above that the
matter should be remanded to the Board, it is apparent that the Award
is not enforceable as it stands."
As a result, the parties presented their respective
contentions to
the Second
Division pursuant to the order of the District Court. However, by the time the
dispute herein came before this Board,
a
decision based upon the Court !s Remand
Order had not yet been received. Subsequently, the Division, in compliance with
the Order of the District Court, has issued Award No. 9779, dated July 27,
1983.
This Board has reviewed the record in great detail and has carefully
analyzed the many complex issues having an impact upon this dispute. In their
submissions and appearances before this Board, both parties have presented
excellent arguments in support of their respective contentions. The key issues
herein were vigorously argued with great skill by the panel members of the
Board so that Neutral sitting herein was able to more fully grasp the many
complexities of the Claimants dispute. It is in large part due to these many
complexities, as well as to the intermingled aspects of the past awards with
their resulting confusion and
inconsistencies, that
the Board finds that it
would serve all parties best to restore the Claimant to duty as a Lineman in a
geographic area which would not make his restoration to service unduly harmful
to him. .
Accordingly, the Claimant is to be provided one more opportunity to report
for duty within 30 days of notice, without back pay but with seniority
restored. His absence for the period involved shall be shown as an absence
from duty without pay and not as discipline.
Form 1 Award No. 10198
Page 3 Locket No. 10135
2-SP-EW-184
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest:
Nancy -~er - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 9th day of January 1985.