Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 10246
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9579
2-KCS-MA-185
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Rodney E. Dennis when award was rendered.
( International Association
of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
Parties to Dispute:
( Kansas City Southern Railroad Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That the Kansas City Southern - Louisiana & Arkansas Railroad Company
violated Rule 29 of the controlling Agreement when it unjustly suspended
Machinist L. T. Hollingsworth for applying the improper length mounting
bolt to an engine blower on May 5, 1980 at Shreveport, Louisiana.
2. That accordingly, the Kansas City Southern - Louisiana & Arkansas Railroad
Company be ordered to compensate Machinist L. T. Hollingsworth at the
pro rata rate of pay for July 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31, and
August 1, 1980, and also 6% per year interest compounded annually.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant L. T. Hollingsworth is employed as a Machinist at Carrier's facilities
in Shreveport, Louisiana. Claimant worked Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m. On May 21, 1980, he was given a notice of investigation directing him
to appear for a formal hearing. That notice reads in pertinent part as follows:
Please arrange to be present for a formal investigation to be held in the Conference Room General
Office Building, 4601 Blanchard Road, Shreveport,
Louisiana at 1:00 p.m., Wednesday, June 11, 1980
to ascertain the facts and determine your responsibility in connection with applying the improper
length mounting bolt to engine blower, resulting
in a locked engine on locomotive number 4160, May 5,
1980.
Form 1
Page 2
Award No. 10246
Locket No. 9579
2-KCS-MA-185
A hearing into the matter was held on June 27, 1980. As a result of that
hearing, Claimant was found guilty and assessed a ten-day suspension. A review
of the hearing transcript and the other documents that make up the record of this
case support Carrier's conclusion that Claimant was guilty as charged and that
some level of discipline was appropriate. We are not, however, persuaded that a
ten-day suspension is an appropriate penalty for the infraction committed. Discipline
in the industrial setting is designed to be instructive, not punitive. It is
this Board's opinion that a ten-day suspension in this case is punitive and is
far more severe than is required for Carrier to make its point with Claimant and .
his fellow employes. We are therefore directing that the ten-day suspension
imposed on Claimant be reduced to a three-day
suspension and
that he be made
whole for all lost wages beyond the three days. In keeping with our policy on
awarding interest, no interest is granted.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Nancy J.
- Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of January 1985.