Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 10252
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9823-T
2-SSR-CM-.185
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee David P. Twomey when award was rendered.

( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United ( States and Canada, AFL-CIO Parties to Dispute: ( The Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company

Dispute: Claim of Employes:












FINDINGS:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.


involved herein.



Dent Yards are less than fifteen miles from the Carriers Hazard, Kentucky Shops. Prior to 1979 Carmen were not employed at Dent Yards. In 1979 due to an increase in the coal business in Eastern Kentucky, four Carmen positions were placed at Dent Train Yards. These positions were bulletined and awarded to four individuals from the Hazard seniority roster. Due to a business slump in 1980, the four Carmen positions at Dent were abolished as of April 29, 1980. Thereafter Trainmen performed the duties of coupling air hoses and making air brake tests in connection with their trains at Dent yards.

The Organization contends that performance of such work by Trainmen is in violation of Rule 30 (c), Rule 104 of the General Rules of the Agreement and also Article V of the September 25, 1964 Agreement; the Carrier disagrees.

We find that the coupling and uncoupling of air hoses and the making of air brake tests is not work exclusively reserved to Carmen under either Rule 30 or Rule 104 of the Agreement of the parties.
Form 1 Award No. 10252
Page 2 Docket No. 9823-T
2-SSR-CM-185

Article V (a) of the September 25, 1964 National Agreement which is relied on by the Organization states:



The above quoted language clearly restricts the application of the article to facilities where "Carmen are employed and on duty."

No Carmen were employed and on duty at Lent yards as of July 19, 1980 (the initial claim date cited by the Organization). Nor were Carmen assigned to Dent Yards thereafter. This being the case, Article V (a) was not violated when trainmen performed the duties of coupling air hoses and making air brake tests in connection with their trains at Dent Yards.

We find that the Organization has not demonstrated that the conditions set forth in Article VI (c) of the December 4, 1975 National Agreement, which amended Article V of the September 25, 1964 National Agreement, were present in the instant case, such that the work in question would be reserved for the Carmen claimants. Clearly as of July 1, 1974 no Carmen were employed at Dent Yards; and this paragraph (c) of Article.VI is not applicable to this case.










Attest: ~g~g~
Nancy r;,^ver - Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of January 1985.