Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 10253
SECOND DIVISION Locket No. 9917
2-MP-CM-'85
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Lamont E. Stallworth when award was rendered
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States and Canada
Parties to Dispute:
( Missouri Pacific Railroad Company

Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence finds that:

The carrier or carrier and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The facts are not in dispute. Claimant, W. W. Martin, worked the Car Inspector's position in the 21st Street Yard on the 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. shift. Prior to the Holiday of May 25, 1981 the Carrier blanked one (1) Car Inspector job in the 21st Street Yard, which was held by the Claimant pursuant to Note to Rule 5:


Form 1 Award No. 10253
Page 2 Locket No. 9917
2-MP-CM-'85

The Claimant did not work the Memorial Day Holiday on May 25, 1981. The Organization contends that the Carrier did not, in fact, blank the Claimant's position in the 21st Street Yard on May 25th. Instead, the Carrier moved Carman Anderson from his assigned position at Lesperance Street Yard to fill the Claimant's assignment in the 21st Street Yard in violation of Note to Rule 5. Furthermore, the Organization charges that Carman Anderson did not hold a job in the 21st Street Yard and therefore, was improperly assigned to work in that Yard on the Holiday.

The Carrier takes the position that Carman Anderson did not fill the Claimant's assignment on the Holiday but only performed the usual duties of his regular assignment.

The record demonstrates that Carman Anderson did spend almost all of his time in the 21st Street Yard where the Claimant should have properly worked. The Carrier has not refuted the Organization's contention. Thus the Board must conclude that Carman Anderson fulfilled virtually the same duties and was employed in the same manner as the Claimant would have been on his normal work day. It follows that the Claimant's Car Inspector position was not blanked on the Holiday.

Once again, the parties have brought before this Board a dispute which we have already reviewed numerous times in the past. This claim involves the same parties, the identical contract Rule, and a similar set of circumstances as cited in Awards 7993, 6261, 6260, 6098, 6097, 6096, 6095 and 6094.

Based upon the overwhelming precedent established by prior Awards, the Board is compelled to sustain the claim and to order the Claimant compensated for eight (8) hours at the time and one-half rate.






                          By Order of Second Division


Attest:
        Nancy J. ,D`e -Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 6th day of February 1985.