Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 10339
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 10499
2-SP-MA-'85
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee James R. Cox when award was rendered.
( International Association of Machinists and Aerospace
( Workers - District Lodge No. 19 - AFL-CIO
Parties to Dispute:
( Southezn Pacific Transportation Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That the Carrier improperly dismissed Machinist F. R. Berumen (hereinafter
referred to as Claimant) from service on December 14, 1982.
2. That, accordingly the Carrier be ordered to restore Claimant to service
with seniority and service rights unimpaired with compensation for all wage
loss.
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board hcjs.jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The Southern Pacific Transportation Company dismissed Machinist F. R.
Berumen from Service December 14, 1982 based upon an alleged violation of Rule
801 of the General Rules and Regulations which specifies that dishonest employees
will not be retained in service.
Claimant was a Machinist in the Truck Shop at the Los Angeles Locomotive
Repair Facility. He had more than approximately 25 years service. His supervisor
indicated that Berumen asked and received permission to go to the Railroad
Retirement Board at 11:30 August 16, 1982. The following morning he called in
indicating that he had hurt his knee the previous day.
Fellow wvrkers who worked near Claimant, testifed that on the 16th they
did not see or learn of any accident he may have had. One did state that Berumen
told him that he was going to retire at the end of August, had a "plan" to
collect two more checks and then was going to retire.
Form 1
Page 2
Award No. 10339
Award No. 10499
2-SP-MA-'85
Berumen maintained that, while pushing a box, he had hit his left knee,
and fell. He resumed work immediately. Claimant did not, however, visit the
Railroad Retirement Board as planned that day because of his alleged injury.
Although Claimant's injury, he said, caused him to go home instead of to the
Railroad Retirement Board, he contends that his knee did not hurt and he did
not believe the problem to be severe enough to report.
Claimant received $17,000 in settlement of a case he filed arising out of
the injury of the 16th with the Carrier's Claim Department. He applied for
retirement in January, 1983.
The evidence indicates that while employees who worked near Claimant on
the 16th were unaware of any accident occurring that day, and Claimant failed
to report any accident until the following day, the Carrier did recognize that
an industrial injury occurred by payment of compensation therefor. Furthermore,
the diagnosis of the Medical Center where Claimant was treated August 19th
prescribed heat for the lower back and knee. Although the failure to report
casts suspicion upon the claimed knee injury occurring August 16th, the evidence
is insufficient to establish that Claimant falsely reported an accident. He
was not disciplined for failure to report the incident.
Claimant to be made whole for any loss of wages from the date he was taken
out of service through the date of his retirement, less outside earnings or
other compensation received allocated to this period and further provided that
Claimant establish that he was able to perform his duties as a Machinist during
this period.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Nancy
- Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of March 1985.