Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 10737
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 10515
2-MP-CM-'86
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Lamont Stallworth when award was rendered.
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
( and Canada
Parties to Dispute:
( Missouri Pacific Railroad Company

Dispute: Claim of Employes:










Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The dispute arose when Carrier held over two Carmen, who regularly worked on the 11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. shift to perform work continuous with their assigned workday. The Carrier had, five days previously, posted a shop bulletin announcing its intention of closing down the shop "after the completion of day's work on November 24, 1982."

Due to an unforeseeable delay, the late arrival of several trains delayed the completion of the two Carmen's regular shift work. The Carrier held over the two men for an additional six hours on an overtime basis.
Form 1 Award No. 10737
Page 2 Docket No. 10515
2-MP-CM-T86

Claimants Monk and McCann, who were regularly assigned to the 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. shift, were not notified to work the holiday and performed no service on that date.

The Organization contends a violation of Rule 5 of the existing Agreement which states:









The fact pattern in the instant dispute is consistent in Second Division Award 4396 and Third Division Awards 19393, 24519 and 25210, wherein the Board held it was not reasonable to expect the Carrier to remove a properly assigned employe from his job and replace him with another employe when unpredictable extra work becomes necessary to complete originally assigned shift work.

But for the Holiday Rule, there is not anything in the contract which prohibits the Carrier from holding over employes for overtime work in order to finish their jobs. Citing numerous past Awards (see 10253, 10254 and 6261), the Organization argues that Carrier has a history of wholesale violation of the Holiday Rule. In the Board's opinion the factual difference in the instant case dictates that the Holiday Rule is not the controlling factor. The Board finds that the case must be decided on the basis of the Overtime Rule.




Form 1 Award No. 10737
Page 3 Docket No. 10515
2-MP-CM-'86
"(b) Employes required to perform work on their rest
days or on the following legal holidays, viz., New Year's
Day, Washington's Birthday, Decoration Day, Fourth of
July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas (provided
when any of the above holidays fall on Sundays the day
observed by the State, Nation or by Proclamation shall
be considered the holiday) shall be paid for at the rate of
time and one-half."
"Rule 4. Overtime And Calls.
"(a) For continuous service after regular working hours,
employes will be paid time and one-half on the actual
minute basis, with a minimum of one (1) hour."

The Board concludes the overtime service compelled by the work in dispute was in accordance with the Agreement; and Claimants Daenen and Armstead have already received proper compensation. The Claims of Monk and McCann are denied.






                          By Order of Second Division


        Attest: N~ancy~- . ver - Executive Secretary


        Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of February 1986.