Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 10745
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 10570
2-N&W-CM-'86
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Paul C. Carter when award was rendered.
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
( and Canada
Parties to Dispute;
( Norfolk and Western Railway Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That the Norfolk and Western Railway Company violated Rules 124
and 125 of the controlling agreement when the Bellevue, Ohio
wreck outfit was called for service outside of yard limits and
not accompanied by the regularly assigned wreck crew at Bellevue,
Ohio, on March 13, 1983.
2. That the Norfolk and Western Railway Company be ordered to
compensate Bellevue, Ohio, regularly assigned wreck crew Carmen B.
G. Wheeler, F. A. Kercher, R. Perrin, W. R. Cramer, R. L. Maxfield,
E. Shumake, and W. Beamer, in the amount of ten and one-quarter
(10 1/4) hours each at the punitive rate of pay for March 13, 1983.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The facts in this dispute do not appear to be in controversy. The
Carrier's Bellevue, Ohio, wreck derrick was called for a derailment at 9:15
A.M., Sunday, March 13, 1983. The derailment occurred at Clarksfield, Ohio,
some twenty-four miles from Bellevue. Cayman W. D. Clapp, a regularly
assigned wreck crew member at Bellevue accompanied the Bellevue derrick to
Clarksfield, Ohio and reportedly "observed" Carmen from Brewster, Ohio,
clearing up the derailment at Clarksfield with the use of the Bellevue
derrick. After completing the work of rerailing equipment at Clarksfield,
Carmen Clapp accompanied the derrick back to Bellevue, arriving there at 7:30
P.M., March 13, 1983. The Claimants herein, in addition to Cayman W. D.
Clapp, are the regularly assigned wreck crew at Bellevue.
r
Form 1 Award No. 10745
Page 2 Docket No. 10570
2-N&W-CM-'86
The Organization contends that the Carrier was in violation of Rules 124
and 125 of the applicable Agreement by not calling the regularly assigned
members of the wreck crew at Bellevue to accompany the Bellevue derrick and
perform the rerailing work at Clarksfield. Rules 124 and 125 provide:
"RULE 121 - WRECKING CREWS
Regularly assigned crews, not including engineers,
will be composed of carmen where sufficient men are
available, and will be paid for such service under
Rule 9. Meals and lodging will be provided by the
company while crews are on duty in wrecking service.
When needed, men of any class may be taken as
additional members of wrecking crews to perform duties
consistent with their classification."
"RULE 125
When wrecking crews are called for wrecks or derailments outside of yard limits, the regularly assigned
crew will accompany outfit. For wrecks or derailments
within yard limits sufficient carmen will be called
to perform the work."
The above rules were cited by the Organization in the on-property handling.
The Carrier contends that Clarksfield, Ohio, is located on the territory
covered by the former Wheeling Lake Erie schedule Agreement and the WLE crew
located at Brewster, Ohio performs wrecking service for Clarksfield; that on
the date involved the Brewster derrick was undergoing repairs in Roanoke,
Virginia, and Carrier called the derrick located at Bellevue (on the former
Nickel Plate Railroad) and the wrecking crew, with the exception of Carman
Clapp, assigned to the Brewster derrick was called to do the rerailing work
with the use of the Bellevue derrick.
The issue involved is not one of first impression before the Board.
Numerous prior Awards have been issued by this Division involving rules
similar to Rules 124 and 125 relied upon by the Organization herein, upholding
the rights of regularly assigned wrecking crew members to accompany the
wrecker derrick when used in the territory of or beyond the points where other
wrecking outfits were maintained. See Second Division Awards Nos. 2185, 4675
and others cited therein, 5003, 5492 and others cited therein, and 7307. We
do not consider the many prior Awards to be in palpable error.
We are not impressed by the Carrier's "damned if you do and damned if you
don't" argument in view of the many precedent Awards of this Division, some of
which were called to the Carrier's attention in the on-property handling.
Neither do we distinguish between "derrick," "wrecker," and "wrecking outfit."
Form 1 Award No. 10745
Page 3 Docket No. 10570
2-NEW-CM-'86
We will sustain the claim to the extent that Claimants be paid the
difference between what they earned on March 13, 1983, and what they would
have earned on that date if they had accompanied the Bellevue derrick to
Clarksfield, performed the rerailment work at that location and accompanied
the derrick back to Bellevue.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest:/ ~ __ ,~`
Nancy J./ r - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of February 1986.