Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 10785
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 10847
2-SSR-FO-'86
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Leonard K. Hall when award was rendered.
( International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers
Parties to Dispute:
( Seaboard System Railroad

Dispute: Claim of Employes:










Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The Claimant, a Service Attendant, Louisville, Kentucky, was charged with being absent without permission for the period September 13 through September 24, 1983 after being cited on June 15, 1983 for absence for period June 2 through June 11, 1983.

He was notified that Investigation relative to the charge would be conducted on October 6, 1983. He was also advised that his personal record would be made a part of the Investigation.

Subsequently the Investigation was delayed account the Claimant's sickness and rescheduled when the Claimant returned to duty. The Investigation was then conducted on December 13, 1983.
Form 1 Award No. 10785
Page 2 Docket No. 10847
2-SSR-FO-'86

In regard to that part of the charge concerning the absence for the period June 2 through June 11, 1983 the Claimant was notified in letter dated June 22, 1983 as follows:
















That letter was made part of the record.

At the Investigation, and after the participants had been identified, the Claimant's Representative stated that the Claimant wanted to address the Investigation Committee. The Claimant then stated:


Form 1 Award No. 10785
Page 3 Docket No. 10847
2-SSR-FO-'86

The Claimant's address to the Committee was followed by these Questions and Answers:



















Now comes the Organization asserting that the Claimant was unjustly treated, that the Carrier was unjust in dismissing him and that dismissal was excessive and uncalled for in view of his admission of guilt. This Board, however, is confined by the axioms set forth in a long line of Awards of this Board to reviewing the Carrier's decision and may not set it aside unless it was arbitrary, unreasonable or discriminatory. On the record before us, we can make no such finding. Accordingly, we must deny the claim.
Form 1 Award No. 10785
Page 4 Docket No. 10847
2-SSR-FO-'86







ATTEST:
        Nancy J. e - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of March 1986.