Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 10855
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 10631
2-B&O-CM-'86
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Leonard K. Hall when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
( and Canada
Parties to Dispute:
(The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company violated the controlling Agreement, specifically Rule 138, when on the date of December 29,
1982, they allowed the General Car Foreman at Cowen, West Virginia, to perform
Carmen's work of repacking car #912019 MWF, in lieu of Carmen who were
available and qualified to perform such work.
2. That accordingly, Carman D. Greenleaf be compensated at the
Carmen's straight time rate of pay, for eight (8) hours, on the date of
December 29, 1982, account such violation.
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The record in this dispute shows that all the Carmen positions at
Cowen, West Virginia were abolished on December 23, 1982 and the incumbents,
including the Claimant were furloughed.
On December 29, 1982 Inspectors from the Federal Railroad Administration and Public Utilities Commission took exception to a torn lubricating
pad and a bent box lid on Car MWF 912019.
For the car to continue in service and continue its movement in an
on-going work train, a General Foreman employed and on duty at Cowen replaced
the pad and the bent box lid, consuming, according to the Carrier, approximately thirty minutes in doing so.
Form 1 Award No. 10855
Page 2 Docket No. 10631
2-B&O-CM-'86
The Organization presented and appealed the Claim, essentially on the
contentions that the replacements performed by the General Foreman was work
contractually belonging to Carmen, that it was a violation of Rule 138,
Carmen's Classification of Work, that it was impossible to perform the work in
question in the time alleged by the Carrier and that the Claimant was qualified and available for eight hours of work and stood to be called.
The Carrier's defense was that the Classification of Work Rule contemplates that the work in question would be performed by a Carman, assuming
Carmen were part of the work force at Cowen; that no Carmen were employed at
that location on the Claim date inasmuch as forces were temporarily furloughed
due to the forthcoming holidays; that the General Foreman was used to avoid
unwarranted delay to the train; that the work was minimal and the Claim should
fail under the de minimus principle.
The amount of time actually engaged by the General Foreman in making
the replacements is in sharp dispute for the Carrier asserted the tasks were
accomplished in the time stated and to the contrary, the Organization asserted
that to be impossible.
Viewing the record submitted by the parties as a whole, we find that
there was a technical violation of the Agreement. We also hold, however,
that in light of that record the Rule of de minimus must prevail. No payment
is due.
The burden of proof rests with the Petitioner, not with the Carrier, .~w
not only in the factual situation but for the ingredients of the Claim itself.
For the Organization to overcome the Carrier's defense, it must present and
demonstrate competent evidence of a probative nature. Otherwise, assertions
no matter how vigorously or often made are not the equivalent of proof that is
essential to the Organization's position. Briefly stated, the burden of
proving a Claim rests on the party seeking its allowance.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
01
Attest: ` _
Nancy J. ? - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of May 1986.