Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 11031
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9845
2-SP-CM-'86
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee John J. Mikrut, Jr. when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
( and Canada
Parties to Dispute:
(Southern Pacific Transportation Company
(Eastern Lines)
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Eastern Lines)
violated the controlling agreement, particularly Rule 15, when they permitted
Carman R. J. Richard to remain on a temporary position after being displaced
from his permanent position, thus preventing him from exercising his seniority.
2. That accordingly, the Southern Pacific Transportation Company
(Eastern Lines) be ordered to permit Carmen R. J. Richard to exercise his
seniority by bulletin in line with Rule 15 and within a reasonable time.
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The background facts of this case are complex.
Claimant, R. J. Richard, occupied permanent Position No. 2021 as a
Carman since August 24, 1980, at Carrier's Lafayette Train Yard/Repair Track,
Lafayette, Louisiana.
On January 19, 1981, Carman J. C. Huval temporarily vacated Position
No. 2105 as a Carman-Welder due to illness. Four (4) days later, Claimant
filled the temporary vacancy subject to Carman Huval's return.
Form 1 Award No. 11031
Page 2 Docket
No.
9845
2-SP-CM-'86
The sequence of events giving rise to the instant dispute began on
May 8, 1981, when Carman G. Phillips' Position No. 2054 was abolished. In
response, Phillips exercised his seniority and
displaced Carman
F. C. Richard
(not to be confused with the Claimant R. J. Richard) from Position No. 2093
effective May 15, 1981.
The next action found F. C. Richard bumping Claimant R. J. Richard
from the temporary vacancy in Position No. 2105; and Claimant, exercising his
rights, bumped to regular Position No. 2023 which was occupied by F. A. Daigle
who was on vacation at the time.
After initially approving the aforestated bumping sequence, Superintendent J. W. Boudreaux, later that same day (May 15, 1981), issued a
"Corrected Notice" disallowing F. C. Richard's bump into temporary Position
No.
2105, which had been held by Claimant, and refilling that position, once
again, with Claimant. In addition, Claimant was denied any further displacement rights while he occupied temporary Position
No.
2105 until he was
released therefrom by the return of the Position's permanent occupant, the ill
J. C. Huval.
Denied his first choice (which was Position No. 2105 which was filled
temporarily by Claimant), Carman F. C. Richard next bumped into Claimant's
permanent Position No. 2021, leaving Claimant without a permanent position and
without the right to occupy any available permanent job.
On February 16, 1982, Carrier was notified that Carman J. C. Huval
had retired retroactive to December 17, 1980. Carman Huval's job was
bulletined permanently on February 26, 1982 on Bulletin 3-C.D. 2105, and was
awarded to Carman F. C. Richard on March 7, 1982. Thereafter, Claimant, who
apparently was displaced from Position No. 2105 as a result of Carman F. C.
Richard's assignment, successfully bid on open bulletin 4-CD-2014, which was a
permanent position, and was assigned effective March 14, 1982.
Before this latter sequence of events, the Organization filed a
grievance in protest of Carrier's action herein alleging that Carrier violated
Rule 15 of the Controlling Agreement by not permitting Claimant to exercise
his seniority rights in order to bid on a permanent position. Said Rule, in
pertinent part, reads as follows:
"RULE 15
Bulletining Vacancies
When new jobs are created or vacancies occur in
the respective crafts, the oldest employees in
point of service shall, if sufficient ability is
shown by trial, be given preference in filling such
new jobs or any vacancies that may be desirable to
them. All vacancies or new jobs created, including
the differential jobs as helpers, will be bulletined.
Form 1
Page 3
Award No. 11031
Docket No. 9845
2-SP-CM-'86
Bulletins must be posted five days before
vacancies are filled permanently. Employees
desiring to avail themselves of this rule will make
application to the officer in charge and a copy of
the application will be given to the local chairman.
Assignment will be made and the successful applicant
assigned within seven (7) days following expiration
of bulletin.
An employee exercising his seniority rights
under this rule will do so without expense to the
carrier; he will lose his right to the job he left,
and if after a fair trial he fails to qualify for
the new position, he will have to take whatever
position may be open in his craft."
According to the Organization, the aforestated Rule clearly established Claimant's bumping rights; and, consequently, Carrier erred by disallowing Claimant's attempt to place himself in a permanent position on May 15,
1981. In remedy of this action, the Organization requested as follows:
"2. That accordingly, the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Eastern Lines) be ordered to permit
Carman R. J. Richard to exercise his seniority by
bulletin in line with Rule 15 and within a reasonable time."
Carrier's point in this dispute is that Claimant was outside the
chain of displacement since he occupied a temporary position which was
contractually unavailable to the more senior Carman F. C. Richard. Both
Parties agree that Carman F. C. Richard could not bump into Claimant's
temporary position because his own regular position was abolished and he would
not have had any displacement rights when the incumbent employe returned to
claim his position. The crux of this dispute, therefore, centers upon
Claimant's right to bump from a temporary position to a permanent position.
In this regard, Carrier maintains that "(T)here is no provisions (sic) in the
agreement which allows an individual to be displaced from a temporary position
except the permanent incumbent of such position when he returns from sick
leave."
In addition to the foregoing, Carrier also argues that the entire
Claim is now moot and should be dismissed or denied in its entirety since
Organization's remedy request has already been satisfied by virtue of the fact
that in March of 1982 Claimant did exercise his seniority rights as per Rule
15 and he successfully bid on bulletined permanent Position 4-CD-2014. (See
Second Division Awards 2672 and 1017).
Form 1 Award No. 11031
Page 4 Docket No. 9845
2-SP-CM-'86
~t
Fortunately, or unfortunately, as the case may be, the issue at bar
became moot due to the retirement of Position No. 2105's permanent occupant,
Carman J. C. Huval, on February 26, 1982, retroactive to December 17, 1980.
Thereafter, Claimant, in subsequent developments, successfully bid and was
awarded a permanent position. Claimant's requested relief thus was granted
before this Board had an opportunity to decide the merits of the Claim which
was presented to it. The Organization, nonetheless, would have us decide the
dispute because the dispute is likely to arise again. If and when the issue
does arise again, it will, at that time, be ripe for decision. Until that
time, however, this Board will follow the sage version proffered in Second
Division Awards 2672 and 1017, and conclude that the dispute lacks a controversy thus declining Organization's request to issue an advisory opinion in
this dispute.
A W A R D
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: r,rr
Nancy J. r - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of October 1986.
rro~