Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD AJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 11234
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 11145-T
2-NIRCRC-EW-'87
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Raymond E. McAlpin when award was rendered.
(International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Parties to Dispute:
(Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation

Dispute: Claim of Employes:

1. That the Northeast Illinois Railroad Corporation violated the current agreement, particularly Rule 71 and Rule 53, on July 23, 1984, when it improperly assigned Yardmaster Pete Barley, Switchman Villa Johnson and Switchman Henry Gargaino to perform Electricians' work on train 42225.

2. That the Northeast Illinois Railroad Corporation be ordered to compensate the Claimant T. Baker, for five (5) hours pay in accordance with Rule 9 (minimum call).

FINDINGS:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



As third party in interest, the United Transportation Union was advised of the pendancy of this case, but chose not to file a Submission with the Division.

On July 23, 1984, Carrier employees, Yardmaster Barley, and Switchmen, Gargaino and Johnson, removed the standby power cables and flashing yellow light from Train 2225, which was located at Union Station at the time.

The Organization claimed that this was an improper assignment per Rule 71, which states in pertinent part:
Form 1 Award No. 11234
Page 2 Docket No. 11145-T
2-NIRCRC-EW-187
"Electricians` work shall include electrical
wiring, maintaining, repairing, rebuilding,
inspecting and installing of all generators,
switchboards, meters, motors and controls,
rheostats and controls, . . . inside and outside
wiring at shops, buildings, yards, and on
structures and all conduit work in connection
therewith . . . and all other work properly
recognized as Electricians' work."

and also a violation of Rule 53, which states as follows:



The Organization noted that, if the Carrier contends a past practice_ it must substantiate such past practice and cited Awards which purport to establish this principle.

The Carrier argued the work was really of a simple nature. In any event, the Rules do not specifically describe the work that is claimed by the Organization. It is the Carrier's contention that the work was not contemplated in Rule 71 and cited awards to that end. The Carrier also noted that, as a longstanding practice of other crafts performing this work, the Organization has not been able to show a Rule or systemwide practice of exclusivity in order to claim this work.

The Board upon complete review of the evidence finds that the Organization has not met its burden in showing either exclusivity by Rule or by practice on this system. There are Awards on this property denying the right of Electricians to remove standby cables under all circumstances, and as is stated in Award 11048:



The act of handling electrical equipment does not violate the Rule cited by the Organization, and, in fact, the work is not exclusive to the Electricians` classification, and, therefore, the Claim will be denied.
Form 1 Award No. 11234
Page 3 Docket No. 11145-T
2-NIRCRC-EW-'87






                            By Order of Second Division


                    -117

Attest:
        Nancy ever - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 1st day of April 1987.