Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 11396
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 11026-T
88-2-85-2-135
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee George S. Roukis when award was rendered.
(International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Parties to Dispute:
(Consolidated Rail Corporation
Dispute: Claim of Employee:
1. Claim of Consolidated Rail Corporation Southern Region, Southwest
Division Radio Maintainer Gary R. Jackson that:
It has been brought to my attention that Mr. M. Logan has been
appointed Assistant CAS Supervisor; replacing former Assistant C6S Supervisor
M. Humes.
This is in violation of the understanding we agreed to in your office
November 4, 1982. As you will remember you assured I.-B.E.W. International
Representative Norman Schwitalla, I.B.E.W. System Council.#7 Vice General
Chairman Dalton Brennan, Assistant General Chairman Fred Jones, I.B.E.W. Local
784 President Gary Jackson and Vice President Mike Blanton that you would see
to it that though the I.B.E.W. had been excluded in the past from bidding on
supervisory position this would not happen again; and you would see to it that
the I.B.E.W. members of the C & S Department would receive copies of the
bulletins.
It was pointed out to you that excluding former N.Y.C.R.R. Assistant
Supervisor E. E. Cogdill none of the supervisors or assistant supervisors in
the Southwest Division of Conrail are former I.B.E.W. In fact and as a matter
of record, all supervisors and assistant supervisors in the C&S Department are
former B.R.S. And during the conversation you admitted that you were formerly
with the B.R.S.
This manifest diacriaiination is intolerable. Therefore, be advised
that we are time slipping this breech of promise under Rule 8-H-1(c) of the
I.B.E.W. - Conrail Agreement dated May 1, 1979. We demand eight hours pay at
the overtime rate for each day beginning November 18, 1983, and to continue
until an I.B.E.W. member is placed in supervision in the CAS Department,
Southwest Division of Conrail,. Claimant of this claim is Local Chairman Gary
R. Jackson.
2. That the Carrier failed to reply within the time limits set forth
in Rule 4-P-1(a) of the Agreement and accordingly the instant claim should be
allowed as presented.
Form 1 Award No. 11396
Page 2 Docket No. 11026-T
88-2-85-2-135
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
As third party in interest, the American Railway and Airway Supervisors Association was advised of the pendancy of this case, but chose not to
file a Submission with the Division.
In this dispute, the Organization contends that Carrier violated the
controlling Agreement, particularly, Rule 8-H-1(c), when Carrier failed to
comply with an on-situs understanding reached on November 4, 1982, that
I.B.E.W. members would receive bulletins of available supervisory positions in
the C & S Department. In this instance, it charges that Carrier appointed a
former BRS employee to an Assistant C & S supervisor's position. It also
asserts that carrier violated the time-limit requirements of Rule 4-P-1(a)
when Carrier failed to reply in timely fashion to its initial Claim letter,
dated November 21, 1983. Its claim is referenced as follows:'
"It has been brought to my attention that Mr. M.
Logan has been appointed Assistant C & S Supervisor; replacing former Assistant C & S Supervisor
M. Humes.
This is in violation of the understanding we agreed
to in your office November 4, 1982. As you will
remember you assured I.B.E.W. International Representative Norman Schwitalla, I.B.E.W. System
Council #7 Vice General Chairman Dalton Brennan,
Assistant General Chairman Fred Jones, I.B.E.W.
Local 784 President Gary Jackson and Vice President
Mike Blanton that you would see to it that though
the I.B.E.W. had been excluded in the past from
bidding on supervisory position this would not
happen again; and you would see to it that the
I.B.E.W. members of the C 5 S Department would
receive copies of the bulletins.
Form 1 Award No. 11396
Page 3 Docket No. 11026-T
88-2-85-2-135
It was pointed out to you that excluding former
N.Y.C.R.R. Assistant Supervisor E. E. Cogdill none
of the supervisors or assistant supervisors in the
Southwest Division of Conrail are former I.B.E.W.
In fact and as a matter of record, all supervisors
and assistant supervisors in the C & S Department
are former B.R.S. And during the conversation you
admitted that you were formerly with the B.R.S.
This manifest discrimination is intolerable.
Therefore, be advised that we are time slipping
this breach of promise under Rule 8-H-1(c) of the
I.B.E.W. - Con rail Agreement dated May 1, 1979. We
demand eight hours pay at the overtime rate for
each day beginning November 18, 1983, and to con
tinue until an I.B.E.W. member is placed in super
vision in the C 5 S Department, Southwest Division
of Conrail. Claimant of this claim is Local
Chairman Gary R. Jackson."
Carrier argues that it fully complied with the time-limit requirements of Rule 4-P-1(a), since the Claim was postmarked on November 22, 1983,
and answered by letter dated ,:7anuary 20, 1984. This was 59 days after the
post-marked date. It further contends that the Claim is without effect, since
Agreement Rule 8-H-1(c) applies only to union officers representing members of
the I.B.E.W. It notes that the Assistant Supervisor's position falls within
the ambit of the Conrail-ARAS Agreement and thus not applicable to the I.B.E.W.
In considering this case, we find that Carrier's answer to the
Organization's initial Claim was timely and consistent with the requirements
of Rule 4-P-1(a). We find no procedural violation.
As to the substantives merits of the Claim advanced, namely was Rule
8-H-1(a) violated when the I.13.E.W. was not informed of the C & S Supervisor's
position, we must concur with Carrier's position that said Rule does not apply
to these circumstances. Rather, it applies to union officials representing
I.B.E.W. members and we find no indication that these representation rights
were breached. We must point out, however, that an understanding, though not
formalized in writing, was ostensibly reached by the parties on supervisory
vacancies in the C & S Department, and Carrier, as a moral obligation, should
insure that the spirit of thin understanding is observed.
We will.not comment on the Conrail-ARAS Agreement, since it is not
before us.
Form 1 Award No. 11396
Page 4 Docket No. 11026-T
88-2-85-2-135
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest:
Nancy .Iaever - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 6th day of January 1988.
low