Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 11624
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 11521-I
89-2-87-2-174
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Paul C. Carter when award was rendered.
(James G. O'Rourke
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Western Lines)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1) That the Southern Pacific Transportation Company did violate the:
controlling Agreement, Rules 25, 38(b), 39, 44 and 46; its own Medical Department's medical "release" and directive, Company Procedure and Company Policy,
therefore, Company Rule, hence, condition and stipulation pertinent to the Controlling Agreement; the claimant's contractual seniority rights; the reinstatement terms of the Leniency Agreement, if valid; has intentionally omitted and
suppressed material evidence from the hearing of March 7, 1986, and has used
undue influence, duress and misrepresented material evidence to obtain signatures, when it improperly withheld Sheet Metal Worker, James G. O'Rourke, from
service and subsequently, arbitrarily and captiously held a hearing on March 7,
1986, and dismissed James G. O'Rourke on April 1, 1986.
2) That Carrier reinstate and restore claimant to active service
with all seniority rights unimpaired and pay claimant for eight (8) hours per
day at a rate of $13.88 per a forty (40) hour work week for all time and wages
lost with interest, in addition, at a rate of ten percent (l0I) and that claimant be made whole and compensated for all vacation rights, contractual back
pay, holiday and sick pay, medical and dental expenses incurred, railroad retirement tax credits, union reinstatement fees and/or union dues and any other
and all contractual rights, privileges and benefits provided in any and all
agreements between the Sheet Metal Workers' International Association and the
Southern Pacific Transportation Company from December 12, 1985 and/or April
1, 1986, when claimant was improperly and wrongfully withheld from service
without just cause and was subsequently, arbitrarily and captiously dismissed
from service, until reinstated; that is, that claimant be made entirely whole
for any and all loses resulting from said dismissal(s).
3) And that Carrier pay and compensate claimant for all contractual
rights, privileges and benefits provided by the Santa Fe Southern Pacific Merger
Protection Agreement or Provided in any resulting Agreement or agreements yet
pending between the Southern Pacific Transportation Company and the Sheet Metal
Workers' International Association and/or any subsequent ICC ruling and/or directive or any result thereof.
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
Form 1
Page 2
Award No. 11624
Docket No: 11521-I
89-2-87-2-174
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The record shows that the Claimant was employed by the Carrier as a
sheet metal worker on March 9, 1971. Following considerable correspondence
concerning Claimant's physical condition, Carrier requested him to undergo a
physical examination by a Carrier doctor, and made three appointments with the
designated doctor for such examination on January 13, 23, and February 6, 1986.
In a letter to Claimant dated January 30, 1986, scheduling the appointment for
February 6, 1986, Carrier advised Claimant that noncompliance with the directive could be considered a violation of Rule 801 of Carrier's General Rules
and Regulations.
The Claimant did not report for the physical examination as instructed,
and on February 18, 1986, Carrier cited him for alleged violation of Rules 801
and 802 of the General Rules and Regulations, those parts reading:
Rule 801: "Employes will not be retained in the service
who are insubordinate."
Rule 802: "Indifference to duty will not be condoned."
Formal hearing was held on March 7, 1986, and on April 1, 1986,
Claimant was notified of his dismissal from the service. Claim was submitted
in behalf of Claimant by the representatives of the craft in which claimant
was employed. Following considerable handling on the property, a leniency
reinstatement agreement was reached with Claimant by Carrier's Works Manager
dated February 2, 1987, reading:
"CERTIFIED - P12 9371840
Mr. James G. O'Rourke
429 40th Street
Sacramento, Ca. 95819
Dear Mr. O'Rourke
February 2, 1987
Per conference between your General Chairman, P. E. Phillips and
Labor Relations Officer, M. A. Givan, we are agreeable to reinstating
you to service with Southern Pacific Trans. Co. on the basis that the
Form 1
Page 3
Award No. 11624
Docket No. 11521-I
89-2-87-2-174
discipline has now served its purpose, you will be reinstated on a leniency basis; that is, with seniority unimpaired. But without compensation
for time out of service.
This reinstatement is contingent upon your passing the required physical examination. You are hereby directed to report to R. W. Ogden in the
Administration Building, Sacramento Locomotive Works, 401 I St. Sacramento,
Ca. at 1:00 p.m. on February 12, 1982 in order to complete the required
paperwork. After the paperwork is completed you are then directed to report to:
Dr. Patrick Clancy
400 "0" Street
Sacramento, Ca.
at 2:15 p.m. Thursday February 12, 1987.
Your signature affixed below, as well as that of your representative,
hereby acknowledges you are fully cognizant of this action at this time,
and that no appeal will be filed on your behalf, or by your union or yourself on this issue or discipline assessed as a result on your formal hearing held on March 7, 1986.
(Sgd) J. H. Wagner
J. H. Wagner
Works Manager
ACCEPTED BY: (Sgd) J. O'Rourke
DATE: Feb. 12, 1987
Feb. 12, 1987
(Sgd) Jim 24cLucas"
We understand that the signature "Jim McLucas" was that of the Local
Chairman of the Organization.
Following the reinstatement agreement, Claimant was examined by Dr..
Clancy and released for duty with no restrictions. On February 20, 1987,
Claimant reported for duty, but advised the Carrier's Health and Safety Director that he was not physically able to perform all the duties, and requested
light duties for thirty days. Claimant was informed that he had been released
for full duty and that he could not be permitted to return to work until he
was physically able to work as a productive employe without risk of personal
injury to himself or others.
On March 4, 1987, Carrier Doctor P. J. Clancy, referred to in the
leniency reinstatement letter dated February 2, 1987, recommended that Claimant
Form 1 Award No. 11624
Page 4 Docket No. 11521-I
89-2-87-2-174
undergo a
psychological assessment. On March 4, 1987, Claimant agreed to such
an evaluation, but failed to keep an appointment made for him.
On July 6, 1987, the Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, submitted a lengthy report to Carrier's Chief Medical Officer, concerning Claimant and concluded:
"In my opinion, he is not capable of returning to work,
as his impairments and defects would place himself and
others at risk."
On July 13, 1987, Carrier's Chief Medical Officer advised Carrier's
Health and Safety Director that Claimant may not return to work.
The Board finds and holds that under the clear terms of
the reinstatement letter of Agreement of February 2, 1987, all claims prior to February 2,
1987, became moot. Claimant could not unilaterally invalidate that agreement.
It was final and binding on all claims prior to that date. That portion of
the claim must be dismissed.
As to that portion of the claim subsequent to
February 2, 1987, the
record is clear that Claimant was not physically qualified to perform the duties
required of him. That portion of the claim will be denied.
We point out that this Board does not have the authority to interpret
or enforce State or Federal statutes or regulations. Our authority is limited
to interpreting or applying agreements between Carriers and their employes.
A W A R D
Claim prior to and including February 2, 1987, dismissed; Claim
subsequent to February 2, 1987, denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest:
Nancy J. dP&r - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 11th day of January 1989.