Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 11657
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 11412-T
89-2-87-2-53
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Marty E. 7usman when award was rendered.
(Sheet Metal Workers International Association
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:

1. That the Carrier, under the Current Working Agreement, assigned the Carmen craft work that belonged to the Sheet Metal Workers at the Raceland Car Shop, Raceland, Kentucky which is a violation of the Current Working Agreement and Rule 126 A of the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway General Agreement.

2. That accordingly, the Carrier be ordered to additionally compensate Sheet Metal Workers, Paul Carmen, ID#2619506 and Kenny Barker, ID4P2621374, forty (40) hours straight time pay each.

FINDINGS:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claim of the Organization is that the work of repairing fiberglass hatched covers removed from one hundred ton hopper cars was assigned to Carmen in violation of Rule 126(a) of the Agreement. In support of its position, the Organization presents a letter of October 27, 1980 from the Carrier acknowledging that when repairing the removed hoods of coil steel cars, the work has been performed by Sheet Metal Workers.

The Carrier maintained that it did not violate Rule 126(a) with the assignment to Carmen as the Agreement Rule did not relate to fiberglass. The Carrier further argued that Carmen had installed, removed and repaired the fiberglass hatched covers for approximately seven years without complaint or Claim. Carrier lastly noted that the letter of October, 1980 referred only to specific repairs on steel hoods used on coil steel cars, which was not applicable to the present Claim.
t7 a ~ r-n rt o 'v a a. r. z cn rt m ~ r o ~i
W rr ~- O ~3' ;:) N £ w rt O G O' w ~' W o
rt rt F.- H (D f3. m W 0 CT' (D C w Oq H
(p (p V (p to H rt A 9 fD H fD p
41. fn ~,,~ ~ v· C1 fD (3. w pi o~ w A N C~.
rt ~ G w h O G m O ~C N
03 a' H c 00 ;3 a 0 m < ro
-t ~-. m w w n N w o ~-n ~-. rD b w
tA (A ~3' 00 I- rt O H (D H
z (7 w p. f1 w (D W C; n G 'TJ m H rt H
p- to rr a· w w o .r w n p a' o rn `C x
w p w r Co n p a. . h o a. m rt H FU o m


o ~r L1. ~' on ~ W G ~ ~ Ow rt w w pH7 · OQ w (D %.O f3.






r· (D m rr O O O W ? (p r· G :3 . n n rt rr O (D
a H (p ~ 'p A W H H (D G h-· rt C · --' ? r-H m 4)
O fi O h fD k-n 7s' d (D E O rD E W n rr w E 'O


m o n G · w a. w ·c < ~- ~o E3 ·o ru ~- hJ ~ f D H a O n` O fD r· < n n fD 17 A L1

x ~ · a. m a ro ~n < r a (n O ? ? o E m-.
r. ro G cn a - m m ro w ro ~. < o a
? n H h A. H o' cr a r· cn a w H u~ ao
r· G w w n a o (n ~-. r* o A. ar n
m n \ r·r m (n ? O W E H rn m o W H rr cD W rt

N < ~ `C fD 0 H w a H G lD W r· E A
N m g x m ~-n w A A m n w cn r En w w a. w
'.7 a CL D' w el) h,· '.7 ? rt (D hJ· rt
Cl. cn (D O O p `C W ., r tv ca. w ? rt p
N V ^y rr, A· rr H (3. r· rt G g G G W r· G O O' O
p. fi fD w ::r N rt rt ~r 0 J;-. VD r-T
W H a A A w - rt w w ? h w 'L5 r'· b b rt rt w
~C N rt CL m x FJ 1-I ~ rt u: cD O G O rn

o w C w p. :3' rt n W w a' r. rt rD rt o · n
rn H o m o w w w Xr o m m n r. r-n r-~ Fg · w
ro ~ ai a ~· cn ^d M G a. M h G n w ~ w r t o0o n 10 r~·

m ~C H v~ G G w r- w c~. r t w o p ~ m w w o
? r-~ fD b rt W fD cr ~o - ro p-' a rt to to w 9 O
H o o n b m ~c "v ~n m w a. n r t p
G H z o ~ w " H w a ~-A w w w rt p o

w a. a a m a' N w o ~. h cu rt H rt


H ID r GL Fa w v- cy, G b G G f3 . H O H N
~C H !D fA G - `C H H a' b w rt w a fn ? r t


.o rn t-, c o (A w rt a. p. Ip G x a r * A (D W
00 r t.» z rt a. O H r D w F~ rt rt w 'd H fD
.,p cn 7a CA O w nn r t n (D E fD rt 1--' W (n H (3.




















            d 1 A 9

                          1 1