Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 11663
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 11533
89-2-88-2-30
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee John C. Fletcher when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen/ Division TCU
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. That the Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company violated
the terms of our current Agreement, particularly Rule 24, when they arbitrarily assigned Missabe Division carmen to perform routine repair work at Two
Harbors which is part of the Iron Range Division.
2. That accordingly, the Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company be ordered to compensate the below listed Claimants. for the days in the
amount indicated:
L. H. Bangsund December 7, 1986 8 hours time & one half rate
" December 12, 1986 "
December 13, 1986
" December 14, 1986 "
R. E. Torgeson December 7, 1986
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
On December 7, 1986 Carrier assigned two Missabe Division Carmen to
work on repairs at Two Harbors on the Iron Range Division. On December 10, 13
and 14, 1986 it assigned one Missabe Division Carmen for the same duties.
Claims were filed by the Organization contending that Rule 24 B was violated
when Missabe Division Carmen were used in the performance of Iron Range
Divi
sion work.
Form 1 Award No. 11663
Page 2 Docket No. 11533
89-2-88-2-30
Rule 24 B provides: -
"The following seniority provisions will apply to the
Carmen's craft:
1. Effective March 21, 1969, any carman, carman helper
or apprentice hired subsequent to said date shall be
granted seniority on a common roster and shall per
form work on the system.
The present carmen, carmen helper and apprentice
seniority rosters shall be maintained and employees
holding seniority on only one roster as of March 21,
1969 will not be forced to accept a permanent assignment on the other division. Employees holding dual
seniority as of March 21, 1969 must make a determination as provided for under present rules as to returning to their original district.
Employees having seniority prior to March 21, 1969
may be used to perform temporary, or emergency work,
including road and wrecking work on the system, and
employees will, if entitled thereto, be granted expenses as provided for in Rule 3 during such service.
When an employee having Division seniority in a particular class as of March 21, 1969 cannot hold a position on his Division, such employee shall have the
right within five calendar days of his furlough to displace any junior employee holding common seniority who
is working on the other Division. If the furloughed
employee fails to comply with the foregoing, the employee will not be able to displace a junior employee
holding common seniority until he returns to service
and is again furloughed on his Division.
This agreement supersedes all rules, agreements, memoranda and understandings in conflict therewith.
(Local Agreement 3-21-69)
Employees represented by the Brotherhood of Railway
Car-men who are assigned at Keenan and/or Iron Junction may perform car inspection, repair and servicing at any point north of and including Skibo on the
Iron Rage Division. Employees represented by the
Brotherhood of Railway Carmen who are assigned at
Form 1 Award
No. 11663
Page 3 Docket
No. 11533
89-2-88-2-30
Proctor and/or Missabe Junction may perform car in
spection, repair and servicing at any point south
of and including Lester Park on the Iron Range Divi
sion."
It is our opinion that Rule
24
does not support the Organization's
Claim. First it is our belief that the language of Rule
24
B does not fence
in the work of the two Divisions so as to preserve to employees of one
Division work on that Division to the exclusion of employees from the other.
Instead, what the Rule accomplishes, in our opinion, is the removal of barriers between Carrier's two Divisions. Through atttrition eventually only one
roster of Carmen will exist on Carrier's entire system.
It is manifest that Rule 24 B replaced former separate Division
seniority arrangements with System seniority. A reading of the clear and unambiguous language of the first paragraph of the Rule indicates that individuals hired after March 21,
1969
were to be placed on a common roster and they
shall perform work on the system.
Under clear language in the second paragraph, Carmen, and others,
having seniority predating March
21, 1969
would be maintained on their existing seniority rosters and would not be forced to accept permanent assignment
on the other Division. However, they could be used for temporary or emergency
work on the other Division and would be paid expenses as provided in Rule 3.
The Organiztion has stressed that the work was not temporary because
Missabe Division Carmen were used repairing cars on the Iron Range Division on
a day-to-day basis. Even if the Organization's point was correct a finding
that the work was not "temporary" would not support a Claim on behalf of Iron
Range Carmen. Rule
24
conveys a right to Carrier to use Carmen with seniority
dates earlier than March 21,
1969
on temporary work on the other Division. If
the work is not temporary, or an emergency (the other condition contained in
the Rule), it is the employee that was misassigned that would have a complaint, not an employee from the location where the work was completed.
Accordingly, we do not find the Organization's Claim to be supported
by the Agreement and it will be denied.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest:
Nancy J.- Executive Secr ary
Dated at Chicago, LLlinoia, this 1st day of March
1989.
voo
- v
o