Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 11680
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 11334
89-2-86-2-153
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Thomas F. Carey when award was rendered.
(International Association of Machinists and
( Aerospace Workers
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (Seaboard System Railroad)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. That CSX Transportation, Inc. violated Rule 30, but not limited
thereto, of the current agreement when it unjustly suspended Machinist W. C.
McClendon for 5 days following an investigation held on June 11, 1985.
2. That accordingly, CSX Transportation be ordered to compensate Mr.
McClendon for all pay and benefits lost (made whole) as a result of said
suspension and remove all reference to the charges from his record.
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The Claimant was employed by the Carrier in its shop in Atlanta,
Georgia, since 1969, suffered a neck injury on June 21, 1984, while inspecting
a locomotive. He was treated by the Carrier's physician, placed on light duty
for a few days, and then released. The Claimant continued to experience neck
pain, however, and periodically complained to his Supervisor that he required
additional medical treatment. His Supervisor subsequently advised him to
.visit his personal physician to confirm if a medical problem did, indeed,
exist. The Claimant's physician initially recommended that he remain on the
job and begin a regimen of therapy. However when no noticeable improvement
was evident after several months of treatment, the physician recommended that
the Claimant temporarily discontinue working in order to receive medication
and therapy on a daily basis.
Form 1 Award No. 11680
Page 2 Docket No. 11334
89-2-86-2-153
The Claimant notified the General Foreman of his physician's advice
on March 12, 1985, and was subsequently granted vacation for the period of
March 12-16, 1985. On March 18, 1985, the Claimant contacted the Foreman
to advise him that his physician had not yet released him to return to work.
The General Foreman indicated that the Claimant should submit a completed 7300
form from his physician, attesting to the nature of the medical problem. On
March 27, 1985, the Claimant also received a certified letter from the Master
Mechanic, requesting that he return the completed 7300 form to the Carrier
within 10 days from the date of the letter.
Although the Claimant attested to having submitted the form to his
physician promptly, the physician did not return the completed form to the
Carrier within the designated 10 day period. As a result, on April 29, 1985,
the Carrier charged Claimant with:
"...being absent without proper authority since
March 19, 1985, and your failure to comply with
Mr. Jones' instructions in his letter to you
dated March 27, 1985, requiring you to furnish
his office with Form 7300 from your personal
physician.
You are charged with violation of Agreement Rule
19, and Rule 7 of Rules and Regulations of the
Mechanical Department which state 'Employees
must not absent themselves from their duties
without proper authority,' and you are charged
with that portion of Rule 3 of the Rules and
Regulations of the Mechanical Department which
state, 'dishonesty,...desertion,... insubordination will subject the offender to dismissal.'"
On June 11, 1985, a hearing was held on the charges. At that
time, the Claimant produced a 7300 form from his doctor, dated April 1, 1985,
along with a written statement from the physician, explaining that the delay
in furnishing the information was due to his own heavy work load. The physician's statement did not mention when the form had been furnished by the
Claimant, nor did the Claimant testify as to when he had received the completed form from the physician. The Claimant was subsequently found guilty of
being absent without proper authority, and with failure to furnish a 7300 form
from his physician. He was notified by letter on June 27, 1985, that he must
serve a 5 day actual suspension, from June 28-July 3, 1985.
It is clear that the Claimant's 7300 form was not filed in a timely
manner. The bulk of the responsibility for this delay appears to rest with
the Claimant's physician, whom in written testimony presented before this
Board, admitted to failing to meet the designated deadline for the submission
of the form. However, it must also be noted that there is no evidence that
the Claimant aggressively pursued obtaining the necessary medical excuse from
the physician, but rather let the deadline go by without ascertaining that the
doctor had complied with the Carrier's requirement. Further, the Claimant
did not produce the completed 7300 form until the hearing on June 11, 1985,
although the form was dated April 1, 1985.
Form 1 Award No. 11680
Page 3 Docket No. 11334
89-2-86-2-153
Based on the evidence presented the Board directs that the 5 day
actual suspension be reduced to a Letter of Reprimand to be placed in the
Claimant's permanent file and that he be made whole for all wages lost during
the five (5) day suspension.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: _
Nancy J. r - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 22nd day of March 1989.