Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 11818
 SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 11675
 90-2-88-2-187
 The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
 addition Referee Paul C. Carter when award was rendered.
 (International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
 PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
 (Burlington Northern Railroad Company

 STATEMENT OF CLAIM:

 1. That in violation of the current Agreement, System Electrician L. V. Doney was untimely and unjustly suspended from the service of the Burlington Northern Railroad for a period of thirty (30) days, September 11 through and including October 10, 1987, following an unfair investigation held on September 23, 1987.

 2. That the investigation held on September 23, 1987 was not a fair and impartial hearing as required by Rule 30(a) of the controlling Agreement.

 3. That the Notice of Investigation failed to apprise Claimant of all the charges against him as required by Rule 30 (c) of the Agreement.

 4. That accordingly, the Burlington Northern Railroad be ordered to compensate Electrician Doney for all wages, benefits, rights and privileges he is entitled to under applicable laws, Rules or Agreements that were lost or adversely affected by the thirty (30) day suspension. That the Burlington Northern Railroad also remove all record of the subject investigation and assessed discipline from Electrician Doney's personal record.

 FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

 The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

 This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Form 1 Award No. 11818 ,,
 Page 2 Docket No. 11675
 90-2-88-2-187

 The record shows that at the time of the occurrence involved Claimant was employed by the Carrier as an Electrician in the Seattle, Washington, area.

 After proper notice to attend an Investigation on September 23, 1987, Claimant was assessed discipline of thirty days suspension, effective September, 1987.

 Upon review of the entire record, the Board finds that none of Claimant's Agreement rights was violated; that the Investigation was properly conducted and that the discipline imposed by the Carrier was not excessive, arbitrary or in bad faith. We find and hold that the Claim must be denied.




                          By Order of Second Division


Attest: .
        Nancy J. De y Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 24th day of January 1990.