Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 12003
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 11790
91-2-89-2-78
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee John C. Fletcher when award was rendered.
(International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Burlington Northern Railroad Company
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
1. That in violation of the current agreement the Burlington
Northern Railroad failed to timely recall Electrician Johnny C. Hilliard of
Tulsa, Oklahoma to a vacant Electrical Craft position at its Tulsa, Oklahoma
Diesel Shop and arbitrarily assigned an employee not of the Electrical Craft
and/or holding seniority as such to fill the subject vacant position.
2. That accordingly, the Burlington Northern Railroad be instructed
to make Electrician Johnny C. Hilliard whole by compensating him for all lost
wages and benefits beginning May 2, 1987 and continuing until his recall and
return to duty at Tulsa. The Agreement of April 1, 1983 is controlling.
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
When Claimant became furloughed in August 1985, he properly advised
Carrier of his desire to work on any open jobs anytime an Electrician was
needed. Claimant's notice set out the address where he could be reached and
specifically indicated that a copy was being furnished Carrier's Tulsa,
Oklahoma Shop Superintendent. During the first week in May 1987, a vacancy
occurred on an Electrician position at the Tulsa Diesel Shop. Carrier filled
the vacancy with a furloughed Machinist while "call back" letters were being
sent to furloughed Electricians.
Form 1 Award No. 12003
Page 2 Docket No. 11790
91-2-89-2-78
The call back procedure took several months with interludes of inactivity because an additional Electrician may not have been needed during
some of
the time. Claimant was returned to employment with Carrier on
December 3, 1987.
Carrier has defended its temporary use of a Machinist on the vacant
Electrician position on a variety of grounds, including an allegation that a
local understanding was reached with IBEW representatives on the matter. We
are not persuaded that any of these defenses are valid. Carrier contended at
the time that it did not have an Electrician available to fill the vacancy,
thus it wanted concurrence to use a furloughed Machinist on the job. This
contention was based on a material mistake in fact. Claimant had complied
with the Agreement, in all respects, and was available for the assignment.
Carrier, knew or should have known, when it sought permission to fill the job
with a Machinist that a furloughed Electrician was available and willing to
assume the vacancy. An understanding, achieved through misrepresentations or
material mistake in fact cannot override clear and positive agreement provisions.
Carrier has also defended on the basis that the Claim was tardy and
that Claimant is an improper claimant because of his seniority ranking at the
time. The improper claimant contention was not raised while the matter was
under consideration on the property, accordingly, under well defined authority, it cannot be considered for the first time at the Board.
On the timeliness matter, the Organization's Claim was filed on -
January 13, 1988. It sought compensation retroactive to May 2, 1987, the date
the Machinist first worked as an Electrician. This obviously goes beyond the
sixty days of retroactivity provided in the parties Time Limit Rule. Accord
ingly, the earliest date covered by the Claim would be November 15, 1987.
Claimant would therefore be entitled to a days pay for each date the Machinist
worked as an Electrician commencing November 15, 1987 and ending December 3,
1987, the date he was returned to service.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest:
~ Nancy J. jolfier - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 20th day of February 1991.