Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 12177
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 11864-T
91-2-89-2-184
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee George S. Roukis when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen/ Division of TCU
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Norfolk and Western Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. That the Norfolk and Western Railway Company violated Rule 31 when
on Thursday, June 23, 1988, Supervisor Ron Jordon was performing carman's
work; opening hopper doors, positioning and activating shakers and closing
doors on numerous occasions throughout the 7:00 a.m. through 3:30 p.m. shift.
This all in violation of rules of the current agreements.
2. That because of such violation the Norfolk and Western Railway
Company be ordered to compensate Carman S. T. Saylor eight (8) hours wages at
one and one-half times the pro rata rate as he was the next available carman
on the overtime board and that the carrier be ordered to cease assigning
supervisors to do carman's work.
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
As Third Party in Interest, the International Brotherhood of Firemen
and Oilers was advised of the pendency of this dispute and filed a Submission
with the Division.
The Organization contends that Carrier violated Rule 31 of the
Controlling Agreement when a Supervisor performed asserted Carman's work on
June 23, 1988. This work included opening hopper doors, positioning and
activating stokers and closing doors on the hopper cars. Specifically, the
Organization maintains that sa.td work accrues under Rule 31 to the Carmen's
craft and accordingly, Carrier was obligated to use Carmen to perform this
work, even on an overtime basis, if an insufficient number of Carmen were
Form 1 Award
No.
12177
Page 2 Docket
No.
11864-T
91-2-89-2-184
on ,duty at the time. The portion of Rule 31 relied upon by the Organization
is referenced in part as follows:
"RULE N0. 31 - ASSIGNMENT OF WORK
None but mechanics, apprentices and hourly rated gang
leaders shall do mechanic's work as per special rules
of each craft. This rule does not prohibit Foremen
in the exercise of their duties from performing
work."
It points out that the Supervisor who performed this work was not a "Working
Gang Leader" and, as such, Carrier was required to call Claimant to perform
the duties of inspecting and maintaining Freight cars.
In response Carrier argues that none of the rules cited by the Organization provide work exclusivity and observes that the Organization has not
established exclusivity via an explicit showing of systemwide practice. It
asserts that Rule 31 does not preclude Foremen from performing this work and
notes that Rule 44 recognizes Supervisory gang leaders as employees covered by
the Carmen's Agreement. It further notes that Claimant had withdrawn his request to work from the Overtime Board as evidenced by the actual overtime call
lists for the period April 15, 1988, through July 4, 1988. On this point, it
showed that Claimant's name no longer appeared on the Overtime Board after May
14, 1988, and further showed that no Claim was initiated contending that his
name was improperly removed from the list.
In considering this case, the Board concurs with Carrier's position.
Simply put, Claimant's name was not on the Overtime Board list for the period
circa June 23, 1988, and there was no showing that it was improperly removed
therefrom. Under these circumstances, Carrier was under no obligation to
ascertain his availability for overtime work, particularly, since his name no
longer appeared on the overtime list after May 14, 1988. In view of these
facts and the absence of any showing of a Rule violation we are compelled to
deny the Claim.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
0040
Attest: ,
Nancy J. ear - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 23rd day of October 1991.