Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 12377
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 12043-T
92-2-90-2-164
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Eckehard Muessig when-award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen/Division of TCU
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Southern Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. That the Southern Railway Company violated Rules 5, 27 and 132 of
the current Agreement when they assigned employes, laborers and a carman, to
work that is specifically assigned to painters. These violations of the
current Agreement took place on July 7, 10, 13 and August 1, 4 and 7, 1989 at
Coster Shops, Knoxville, Tennessee.
2. That accordingly, the Southern Railway Company now be ordered to
compensate Painter L. D. Carter for five (5) hours for the work performed on
July 7, 10 and 13, 1989 and for five (5) hours on August 1, 4 and 7, 1989 on
C. R. Wyrick. This is a five (5) hour call for each day.
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
At Third Party in Interest, the International Brotherhood of Firemen
and Oilers was advised of the pendency of this dispute, but chose not to
intervene.
This claim arose because various employees held stencils for the
Claimant, who is a painter, on the claimed dates.
The Carrier denied the claim asserting that Rule 132 of the controlling Agreement does not award the work claimed exclusively to the painters
and that there was not a system-wide practice to support the Organization's
contention that the claimed work belonged to the Carman Craft.
Form 1
Page 2
Award No. 12377
Docket No. 12043-T
92-2-90-2-164
The holding of stencils is not included in Rule 132. Moreover, that
part of the record developed on the property that is properly before us shows
that other craftsmen and supervisors have held their own stencils or have at
times held stencils for others throughout the shop area.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
a~
cy
J.
Executive Secre ary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of July 1992.