CORRECTED
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 SECOND DIVISION Award No. 12487
Docket No. 12309
92-2-91-2-106
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Edward L. Suntrup when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen/
(Division of TCU
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (formerly
(The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. That the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company (CSX
Transportation, Inc.) (hereinafter referred to as "carrier")
violated the service rights of Carmen J. D. Penix, G. McSorley, C.
Heighton, Jr., E. Kazee, G. Potter, P. Cunningham, C. Akers, J.
Hannah, V. Turvey and J. Waltlers (hereinafter referred to as
("claimants") and the provisions of Rule 27 of the controlling
agreement when on November 25, 1987 the carrier at the end of
claimants' regular second shift assignment informed the claimants
not to report back until ;,ranuary 4, 1988 and not allowing the
claimants a proper five (5) day notice of furlough.
2. Accordingly, the claimants are entitled to be compensated
for five (5) days pay at the applicable straight time for said
violation.
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carrier: and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute. waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Form 1 Award No. 12487
Page 2 Docket No. 12309
92-2-91-2-106
On January 4, 1987, the nine Claimants to this case filed a
Claim for five days' pay on grounds that the Carrier had violated
Rule 27 of the operant Agreement when it failed to provide proper
notice of furlough as provided by this Rule. The Carrier shut down
its Raceland Car Shop from November 25, 1987, through January 3,
1988. According to the Claimants, neither they nor their union
Representatives had been advised of this properly.
The Rule at bar reads, in pertinent part, as follows:
"Rule 27--(Revised Effective June 1, 1969.)
(a) When it becomes necessary to reduce
expenses, the force at any point, or in any
department or subdepartment thereof, shall be
reduced, seniority to govern as follows:
A. One seniority for machinists.
B. One seniority for boilermakers.
C. One seniority for blacksmiths.
D. One seniority for sheet metal workers and
pipefitters.
E. One seniority for electricians.
F. Four subdivisions for the carmen as follows:
(1) Patternmakers.
(2) Upholsterers.
(3) Painters.
(4) Other Carmen.
G. Helpers will hold their seniority in the
respective departments or trades above listed.
(b) Except as provided in Paragraph (g) of
this rule, five working days' notice will be given
the men affected before reduction is made, and
lists will be furnished the local committee.
UNDERSTANDING--(Revised July 16, 1982.)
(3) The company has already issued
instructions which will result, we hope, in giving
the full five working day notice to employes who
will be affected by a suspension, from now on,
which is a change from past practice; but there may
be times, at certain places, when the company may
not be able to post its notice so it can be seen by
the men before work time of the first of the five
days, and it may so happen that it will be lunch
time before the notice is posted; and in that case,
the company would expect to count that day as one
of the five working days notice. In such a case,
Form 1 Award No. 12487
Page 3 Docket No. 12309
92-2-91-2-106
the men would be privileged to see the notice when
posted."
In denying the Claim: the Carrier states, at the first level
of handling, and at subsequent steps, that it had issued Bulletin
#13 on November 17, 1987, in which it was noted that the Raceland
Car Shop:
"...would be shut down except for the force
indicated at the end of assigned shift
Wednesday, November 25, 1987, through January
3, 1988, and that those employees affected
would be governed by Rule 60 1/2 of the Shop
Crafts Agreement, and all employees would
report to their regularly assigned position at
7:00 A.M., Monday, January 4, 1988, unless
notified in writing. This was attached to all
Bulletin Boards with a copy to all Local
Chairmen.
Additionally, it is noted that the carmen
working first shift in the Valve Room were
specified by name and identification number,
copy attached."
The Bulletin in question states the following and is cited here in
toto for the record:
Russell, Kentucky
November 17, 1987 wy
JTT-147
110.06
PLANT MANAGER'S BULLETIN #13
All Employees:
Raceland Car Shop will be shut down except for the force
indicated below, from end of assigned shift, Wednesday, November
25, 1987, through end of assigned shift January 3, 1988.
The force working during this shut down period will be as
follows:
B&B Foreman - 1
B&B Mechanic . - 2
Blacksmith - 8
Carman - 58
Electric Crane Opr. - 1
Electrician - 21
Form 1
Page 4
Award No. 12487
Docket No. 12309
92-2-91-2-106
Laborer
Machinist
Machinist Hpr.
Office Personnel
Painter Hpr.
Painter
Sheet Metal Wkr.
Supervisor
TOTAL
23
36
3
11
8
8
13
15
208
In reference to the above employees who will be working,
attached is a position listing of those positions which will be
working. This list also indicates the incumbent on the position.
All other positions will be abolished effective end of shift
Wednesday, November 25, 1987.
If the position which an employee is-working does not appear
on the attached list then that position is abolished and the
incumbent may exercise his rights under the applicable agreement
rule, Rule 60 1/2 for Shop Crafts and Rule 13 for Firemen and
Oilers.
All employees, by this notice, are recalled and will report to
their regularly assigned position beginning effective 7:00 A.M.,
Monday, January 4, 1988, unless notified in writing.
R. D. Bridgman, Jr.
Plant Manager
cc - All Bulletin Boards
All Local Chairman
CARMEN WORKING SHUT DOWN
H. R. Coleman
Paul Roark
A. M. Rice
N. Hartman
Glen Bays
William Fannin
Wandel Elpin
Fred Diller
Adrain Flocker
Franklin Binion
Carson Gullett
Clyde Wheeler
Jack Spainhower
Forrest Logan
John Nunley
Raymond McCallister
- 1st Shift - Value Room
2080094
2004183
2089674
2700130
2004799
2255096
2100576
2100572
2100623
2245871
2100694
2100758
2100756
2100847
2100549
2167752
Corrected
Form 1 Award No. 12487
Page 5 Docket No. 12309
92-2-91-2-106
Emit Manning - 2100917
John Messer - 2101009
Donald Baker - 22:55144
Elwood Carroll - 2286030
Ernest Bailey - 2101165
Winfield Howard - 2101184
Thomas Baldridge - 2089232
Norman Thompson - 2176693
Wesley Kilburn - 2101267
WORKING VACATION VACANCIES WEEK OF 11/30 - 12/4
Gary Stephens
Luther Lyons
Athine Kelly
Larry Clevenger
Gary Melvin
2101202
2197920
2101312
2101445
2101234
****As of November 25, 1987, second shift, Valve Room, will not be
working during the shut down from 11/25 through 1/3."
The consistent position of the Organization in this case is,
as the General Chairman states in his April 3, 1989 correspondence
to the Carrier, that both the Local Chairman, and the employees
working the Triple Valve Room, "...maintain, (however), that the
alleged notice was never posted ...." The Carrier responds, by the
Director of Labor Relations' correspondence to the General Chairman
under date of March 26, 1990, as follows:
". . . (This)
bulletin was addressed to 'All
Employees', and advised more than 750
employees in all departments of the Raceland
Car Shops, including the Tripe Value Room
where Claimants worked along with some 30
other carmen, of: jobs being abolished as a
result of the shutdown and of the number of
employees in each craft which would be
required to word: during the shutdown. The
bulletin even named the employees who would be
required to work during the shutdown.
The Carrier asserts that the bulletin was
posted. Eleven of more than 40 carmen in the
Triple Valve Room contend it was not. Stated
another way, 11 of more than 750 employees in
Raceland Car Shops contend it was not.
Form 1 Award No. 12487
Page 6 Docket No. 12309
92-2-91-2-106
Obviously, if the Carrier had failed to
post such notice it would have been flooded
with over 750 similar claims from more than
six different
Organizations, the
majority of
which would have been appealed by your
Organization. The absence of such a deluge of
claims supports the facts that the notice was
indeed posted."
A review of the complete record on this case does not contain
sufficient probative evidence to support either the Carrier's or
the Organization's position. When such irreconcilable differences
occur, "...such claims have traditionally been dismissed by this
Board" (See Third Division Award 26428: also Third Division Awards
19702, 20053, 23834, 26679 and Fourth Division Award 3201). Given
the record before it the Board can see no reason to diverge from
such precedent in the instant case.
A W A R D
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest:
ancy Jeer - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 18th day of November 1992.