NATIONAL .RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 SECOND DIVISION Award No. 12549
Docket No. 12298
93-2-91-2-133
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Edward L. Suntrup when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen/Division TCU
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway
( Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"1. That the Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range
Railroad Company violated the terms of our
current Agreement, in particular Rule 65(b).
2. That, accordingly, the Duluth, Missabe & Iron
Range Railroad Company be ordered to
compensate Carmen and Assistant Wrecking
Foremen D. Wayt, W. Erickson, C. Carlson and
V. Ophus in the amount of sixteen (16) hours
each at the time and one-half rate: and in
addition eight (8) hours each at the double
time rate of pay for the dates of November 5
and 6, 1989. Further, that the Carrier be
ordered to compensate Carmen and Wrecking Crew
extra list Carmen B. Chesney, D. Stoneburner,
P. Larson and E. Woods in the amount of
sixteen (16) hours each at the time and onehalf rate; also eight (8) hours at the double
time rate of pay for the dates November 5 and
6, 1989. We further claim that the Carrier be
ordered to compensate Carmen and Wrecking crew
extra list Carmen G. Brieman and L. Korpela in
the amount of 'ten (10) hours each at the time
and one-half rate of pay account of the
Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railroad Company
failing to call these DM&IR Wrecking Crew
Carmen for a derailment at Taconite Junction
Switch #74, Minnesota on the dates of November
5 and 6, 1989."
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
Form 1 Award No. 12549
Page 2 Docket No. 12298
93-2-91-2-133
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
A claim was filed by the Local Chairman of the Organization on
December 28, 1989, on grounds that the Carrier had violated the
Agreement, and a May 11, 1988 letter when it permitted Burlington
Northern Carmen to rerail two BN locomotives and two freight cars
which had derailed on November 5, 1989. The derailment of BN Train
No. 897 occurred at Taconite Junction on DM&IR property.
The pertinent provisions of the Agreement cited by the
organization are the following:
"Rule 65(b)
When wrecking crews are called for wrecks or
derailments outside of yard limits, a
sufficient number of the regular assigned crew
will be called. For wrecks or derailments
within yard limits, sufficient carmen will be
called to perform the work."
The joint letter, dated May 11, 1988, which is signed by the
General Chairman and the Carrier's Director of Personnel and Labor
Relations, which is cited in the claim, states the following, in
pertinent part:
"I will agree that in the future, foreign
railroad employees will not be permitted to
repair cars that have been rejected in
interchange, on DM&IR property. I will also
agree that when a foreign railroad furnishes a
crane and operator to aid in clearing
derailments of DM&IR trains, any foreign
railroad employees who accompany the crane
will do no work other than operate and service
said crane."
According to the claim, BN Carmen spent some 350 manhours rerailing
the equipment. According to the Carrier, it only took some 80
hours to rerail the equipment.
The Carrier argues that there was no Rule violated. The
Carrier admits that while the DM&IR has a Joint Operating Agreement
with the Burlington Northern Railroad which allows the BN to
operate over the tracks in the Taconite area, the March 1, 1922
Agreement is silent as to how or by whom any wrecking services are
Form 1 Award No. 1254!
Page 3 Docket No. 12298
93-2-91-2-133
to be performed in this joint operating area. In the absence of
Agreement language, according to the Carrier, it is the
responsibility of the railroad operating at the time of
<3
derailment to rerail any of its own engines or cars. The Carrier"
argument here is consistent with arbitral precedent which state:
that "...the operator responsible for the work is the one to carry
it through to completion." (See Second Division Awards 4169, 7833,
and 11044; also First Division Awards 5777, 15404 and 18612 inter
alia .
With respect to the specific Rule of Agreement cited by the
Organization, the Board must conclude that Rule 65(b) does not
support the claim. That Rule deals with the eventuality of when
wrecking crews are called. It does not mandate that they should be
called in instances of the type here at bar when the derailment of
foreign equipment takes place, even if it is on Carrier's trackage.
Likewise, the May 11, 1988 letter clearly deals with the
"...derailments of DM&IR trains..." as the language of that letter
states. There was no derailment of a DM&IR train on November 5,
1989, at Taconite Junction. The two locomotives and two freight
cars which were derailed belonged to BN Train No. 897.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest:
ancy J.~ever - Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago/, Illinois, this 28th day of July 1993.