NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 SECOND DIVISION Award No. 12555
Docket No. 12363-'.C
93-2-91-2-1715
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee John C. Fletcher when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen/Division TCU
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Norfolk Southern Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"1. That the Southern Railroad Company violated
the controlling agreement when work belonging
to the Carmen's Craft (painters) was
improperly assigned to employes of the
Machinist Craft at John Sevier Train yard,
Knoxville, Tennessee on April 30, May 4, and
June 6, 1990.
2. That accordingly, the Southern Railroad
Company be ordered to compensate Painter J. H.
Strange two (2) hours pay for each of the
incidents at the rate of time and one-half.
Also, that the Painter position at John Sevier
be readvertised and the Company stop assigning
the work of the Painters' to other crafts."
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
As Third Party in Interest, the International Association of
Machinists and Aerospace Workers was advised of the pendency of
this dispute, and filed a submission with the Board.
The claim in this Docket involves three instances where a
Machinist performed work at Knoxville, Tennessee, which the
Carmen's Organization claims its Painters' work reserved to members
Form 1 Award No. 12555
Page 2 Docket No. 12363-T rr
93-2-91-2-176.
of its Craft. The first instance occurred on April 30, 1990, when
a Machinist was making minor repairs to the doors and window of a
highway vehicle. In the process of performing this work the paint
was damaged and the machinist performed some minor touching-up.
The time devoted to touch-up painting took less than an hour. The
second occurred on May 4, 1990, when a Machinist fabricated
handrails for a new highway truck about to be placed in service.
When the fabrication was completed the handrails were painted.
Also, a Norfolk Southern logo decal was applied to the doors of the
vehicle. These task took less than an hour. The last instance
occurred on June 6, 1990, when a machinist applied paint to a rear
grab iron on a locomotive he was inspecting for FRA defects. This
task took less than 30 minutes.
Carrier maintains that it is permissible to have Machinists
perform these minimal painting tasks as a part of their regular
duties. Additionally, the Machinists' Organization has intervened
as a Third Party in this matter and its response contends that
members of its Craft have the right to perform minor touch-up
painting and apply decals and logos as incidental activity when the
painting and logo application is an integral part of the repair
work being completed.
The Carmen's Organization has not demonstrated that its
Agreement reserves the work involved in the three claims before
this Board exclusively to members of its Craft. Instead, the
evidence is conclusive, Machinists have in the past performed minor
painting touch-up and logo application at various locations
throughout Carrier's system. This work, being incidental to the
primary task being completed by the Machinist, is not reserved
exclusively to Carmen. Accordingly, the Board concludes that the
Claim is without merit. It will be denied.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest, · ~~f
- Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of July 1993. _-