NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 SECOND DIVISION Award No. 12556
Docket No. 12373-T
93-2-91-2-166
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee John C. Fletcher when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen/Division TCU
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Chesapeake
(and Ohio Railway Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"1. That the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company
(CSX Transportation, Inc.) (hereinafter
'carrier') violated the provisions of Rules
32, 154 and 179; of the Shop Crafts Agreement
between Transportation Communications
International Union -- Carmen's Division and
the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company (CSX
Transportation, Inc.) (revised June 1, 1969)
and the service rights of Carman D. Grissom
(hereinafter 'claimant') when the carrier
allowed persons other than a Carman to couple,
inspect and perform other tests on
appurtenances relating to trains departing
yards.
2. Accordingly, the claimant is entitled to be
compensated four (4) hours pay at the
applicable straight time rate in accordance
with the provisions for Rule 7(c) of the
Controlling Agreement for the carrier's
violation of Rules 32, 154, and 179;."
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Form 1 Award No. 12556
Page 2 Docket No. 12373-T
93-2-91-2-166
As Third Party in Interest, the United Transportation Union
was advised of the pendency of this dispute, but chose not to file
a submission with the Board.
Claimant, the Local Chairman, filed the instant Claim,
contending that Rule 179 1/2 was violated when on December 31,
1988, a Trainman was observed connecting air hoses and making an
air brake test at Fulton Yard. Carmen are assigned to Fulton Yard
and when the work was performed by the Trainman, Carmen were on
duty. When the Claim was appealed to Carrier's Mechanical
Superintendent an offer to pay the Claim on a no precedent basis
was made. The Local Chairman agreed to settle the claim, but only
with precedent. Further handling on the property did not produce
a settlement, and generated further disputes that time limits were
violated and that the Organization did not have an exclusive right
to perform the work involved.
There is little doubt in this industry that at yards where
Carmen are employed and on duty they are entitled to perform the
work of coupling air hoses and making air brake tests for departing
road trains. Rule 179 1/2 of the Agreement was violated when these
tasks were performed by a Trainman on December 31, 1988.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest:
ancy J ver - Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of July 1993.