NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 SECOND DIVISION Award No. 12562
Docket No. 11980
93-2-90-2-95
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert O. Harris when award was rendered.
(International Association of Machinists and
(Aerospace Workers
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Chicago and North Western Transportation
(Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"1. That the Chicago and North Western
Transportation Company (hereinafter
referred to as the 'Carrier')
violated the provisions of the Joint
Agreement,, as amended July 1, 1979,
specifically Rule 35, when,
subsequent to an investigation which
was neither fair nor impartial, it
unjustly and improperly suspended
council Bluffs, Iowa Machinist
employee D. L. Smith (hereinafter
referred to as the 'Claimant') from
service for a period of five (5)
days.
2. That accordingly the Carrier
compensate Machinist D. L. Smith for
all wages lost while suspended,
additionally, credit Machinist Smith
for time lost for vacation and other
benefit rights, and that record of
the investigation proceedings,
including reference to his unjust
disciplines, be expunged from his
personal :record."
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of .the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that: .
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and. employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
Form 1 Award No. 12562
Page 2 Docket No. 11980
93-2-90-2-95
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Claimant was late to work on two occasions, 30 minutes once
and 15 minutes the other time. Thereafter he received an injury
while away from work and asked to be marked off for sickness. His
request was refused. He then asked for the days off as personal
leave days and this was taken under advisement as the approving
carrier official was not present. The request was subsequently
denied and because Claimant had earlier been placed on the new
discipline system, he was suspended for five days.
The Carrier has not denied Claimant's contention that he asked
for light duty or to take leave for the days he would be absent.
It denied his request and then charged him with failure to obey the
rules. As noted by the Organization this put Claimant in a catch22 situation where he should not work if injured, but would be
disciplined if he did not work. The Carrier was under an
obligation to either grant Claimant's request for leave or deny it
at the time. It failure to do so caused Claimant to be uncertain
as to his responsibilities. Its disciplining of Claimant can not
be sustained.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
_a
Attest:
~ ~-~-~-E-«~ '
Catherine Loughrin - ~.riterim Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of September 1993.