NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 SECOND DIVISION Award No. 12575
Docket No. 12524
93-2-92-2-50
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee John C. Fletcher when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen/Division TCU
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Chicago and North Western Transportation
( Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"1. Carman Jerry Dirks, Council Bluffs, Iowa,
was deprived of work and wages to which
he was entitled when the Chicago and
North Western Transportation Company
violated Rules 14, 16 and 25 of the
controlling Agreement when he was not
allowed the right to exercise his
seniority on October 1, 1990 upon return
from a leave of absence.
2. Accordingly, Carman Jerry Dirks be paid
one (1) day's wages at the straight time
rate ($119 . 08) , plus all overtime that he
was entitled to on October 1, 1990."
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved hertsin.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Claimant was on a leave of absence. Pursuant to Rule 25(i).,
Claimant, on September 17,. 1990, notified the Carrier that he
wanted to return to service and was given a return to- duty physical
on the afternoon of September 19, 1990. On Friday, September 28,
1990, Claimant was medically approved to return to service. On
Monday, October 1, 1990, Claimant was not allowed to displace on
Position 027 and that generated this claim.
Form 1 Award No. 12575
Page 2 Docket No. 12524
93-2-92-2-50
Carrier explains what occurred as follows:
"On Friday morning, the Medical Department
notified the Equipment Maintenance Department
that Claimant was cleared to return to work.
Later in the day, the Car Department notified
their supervisor in Council Bluffs that
claimant had been cleared medically to return
to work. However, the supervisor was not at
that location on Friday. Upon returning to
work on Monday--the first work day after the
notification--he notified the claimant that he
had been cleared to return to work and he
could return to work the following day--the
second of October."
On the basis of the foregoing, the claim is sustained for
October 1, 1990 except that there is no evidence in the record to
support the allowance of any overtime.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings. -
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest:
Catherine Loughrin - ~ nterim Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of September 1993.
mov