NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 SECOND DIVISION Award No. 12600
Docket No. 12469-T
93-2-91-2-274
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee John C. Fletcher when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen/Division TCU
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Chesapeake
(and Ohio Railway Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"1. That the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad
Company (CSX Transportation, Inc.)
(hereinafter 'carrier') violated the
controlling Shop Crafts Agreement,
specifically Rule 158, by utilizing
members of the train crew to perform the
duties and work of the Carman craft on
May 20, 1990, when members of the craft
were available, willing and qualified to
perform that work.
2. That accordingly, the Chesapeake & Ohio
Railroad Company (CSX Transportation) be
ordered to additionally compensate Carman
Keith Ison and Carman Cecil Woods in the
amount of two (2) hours and forty (40)
minutes call each at carman time and onehalf hourly rate of pay for the violation
on May 20, 1990."
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Form 1 Award No. 12600
Page 2 Docket No. 12469-T
93-2-91-2-274
As Third Party in Interest, the United Transportation Union
was advised of the pendency of this dispute, but did not file a
Submission with the Board.
The organization is alleging that its Agreement was violated
when a caboose was rerailed on May 20, 1990, in the Big Four Yard,
Russell, Kentucky. The facts involved indicate that the train crew
assigned to this caboose used wooden blocks and their locomotive to
pull the caboose back upon the rail. This Board has held many
times that it is not an Agreement violation when a train crew
performs simple rerailing of locomotives, cars or cabooses in their
own trains without additional assistance. For example in Second
Division Award 8650, we held that "rerailing without the use of
special equipment is not exclusively Carman's work." The
organization has not demonstrated that the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest:
Catherine Loughr~-v n~ terim Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of October 1993.