NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 SECOND DIVISION Award No. 12601
Docket No. 12470--T
93-2-91-2-275
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee John C. Fletcher when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen/Division TCU
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Chesapeake
(& Ohio Railway Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"1. That the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad
Company (CSX Transportation, Inc.)
(hereinafter referred to as 'carrier')
violated the controlling Shop Crafts
Agreement, specifically Rule 154, when
the carrier allowed three members of the
Sheet Metal Workers Craft to perform
Painters' work on April 19, 1990 when
members of the craft were available,
willing and qualified to perform that
work.
2. Accordingly, the carrier be ordered to
additionally compensate Painters T.
Miller, D. Ramey and T. Kearns (hereinafter referred to as 'claimants') for
four (4) hours each at the applicable
time and one-half rate for said
violation."
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Form 1
Page 2
Award No. 12601,
Docket No. 12470-T
93-2-91-2-275
As Third Party in Interest, the Sheet Metal Workers'
International Association was advised of the pendency of this:
dispute, but did not file a Submission with the Board.
This claim involves an allegation of the organization that its
Agreement was violated when three Sheet Metal Workers painted a
winch guard cage they had fabricated and installed in Carrier': >
Raceland, Kentucky, Car Shop. Initially the Claim was denied with
an acknowledgment that Sheet Metal Workers did in fact install the
winch guard cage on the West end of Track No. 5 of the Erecting
Shop on April 19, 1990, but that they "did not paint said cages."
This denial was refuted by an eye witness statement indicating that
the Sheet Metal Workers were observed painting the cages. Carrier,
then altered its denial, stating that historically Sheet Metal
Workers had painted guard cages they had fabricated to prevent
corrosion.
Carrier utilizes a large number of Carman Painters in its
Raceland Car Shop. It would seem that painting work occurring at
that facility would be assigned to Carman Painters. Carrier has
not established, with sufficient evidence, that Sheet Metal Workers
have historically painted guard cages, as it argued. Accordingly,
the Claim will be sustained.
A W A R
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Catherine Loughrin Interim Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of October 1993.