NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 SECOND DIVISION Award No. 12605
Docket No. 12504
93-2-92-2-24
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee John C. Fletcher when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen/Division TCU
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Chesapeake
(& Ohio Railway Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"1. That the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad
Company (CSX Transportation, Inc.)
hereinafter referred to as 'carrier',
violated the controlling shop crafts
agreement, specifically Rules 1, 37, 38,
60~, 183 and 185, when the carrier
improperly disqualified and dismissed
Carman Paul Stapleton from service on
December 18, 1989.
2. Accordingly, the carrier be ordered to
additionally compensate Carman Paul
Stapleton for all regular and overtime
wages lost commencing on December 19,
1989 and continuing until Mr. Stapleton
is permitted to return to actual
service."
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Claimant's position was abolished at Carrier's Raceland Car
Shop on December 15, 1989. Claimant exercised his seniority by
displacing a junior employee in the Air Brake Shop. He was
Form 1 Award No. 12605
Page 2 Docket No. 12504
93-2-92-2-24
assigned to test ABD emergency valves. Employees testing AB!D
valves average twenty test per shift. The first day Claimant
worked in the Air Brake Shop he tested only four valves. On the
basis of this performance, he was disqualified by Carrier's General
Foreman.
This Board has previously held, in two Awards involving this
facility, that an employee must be qualified for the position t_o
which he is exercising seniority. Second Division Awards 12182 and
12190. The fact that Claimant was able to perform only twenty percent of the average amount of work expected of employees assigned
to test ABD valves generates a strong presumption that he was not
qualified for the position to which he exercised his seniority.
The organization offered nothing to overcome this presumption. The
Claim is without merit.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest:
Catherine Loughrin Interim Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of October 1993.