The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
Subsequent to an Investigation, the Carrier found that the Claimant had missed all or part of his assignment on seven dates during the period from February 21 through April 15, 1991. In addition, the Claimant tested positive for a prohibited drug.
The testimony adduced from the Hearing held on this case, including the claimant's own testimony, shows that he was absent on Form 1 Award No. 12623
the dates charged by the Carrier. It also shows that the Carrier's determination with respect to the Claimant's use of prohibited substances was well-founded.
Accordingly, given the finding of guilt to the very serious charges and noting that the Claimant has less than one year of service during which he failed to show that he could be a dependable employee, the Board has no basis to intervene in this matter.