Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No. 12740
Docket No. 12593
94-2-92-2-125

The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Rodney E. Dennis when award was rendered.

(International Association of Machinists ( and Aerospace Workers PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Chesapeake ( and Ohio Railway Company)

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:



Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.

Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
Form 1 Award No. 12740
Page 2 Docket No. 12593


Claimant is employed by Carrier as an Equipment Mechanic. On October 17, 1991, Claimant reported to his Supervisor that :he stepped in a hole in Parsons Yard and injured his left knee. He was offered medical treatment, but refused it. Later in the month, Claimant went to his personal physician and underwent orthoscopic surgery on both knees. On February 12, 1992, Claimant presented Carrier's Claim Agent with a bill for surgery on his right knee, citing the date of injury as October 10, rather than October 17. Since Claimant was not able to explain away the confusion about which knee or whether both knees were injured and on what day his injury occurred, Carrier preferred the following charge against him:







A Hearing into the matter was held as scheduled on March 12, 1992. As a result of that Hearing, Claimant was found guilty as charged and assessed a 30-day suspension. A transcript of the Hearing has been made a part of the record. A review of the record reveals that Claimant was afforded a full and fair Hearing and was guilty as charged. This Board concludes, based on the record, that Carrier did not act in an arbitrary or capricious manner in this instance and that a 30-day suspension is not excessive.





Form 1 Award No. 12740
Page 3 Docket No. 12593
94-2-92-2-125



This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(sj riot be made.


                              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of Second Division


                              Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of September 1994.