Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No.
12768
Docket No. 12594
94-2-92-2-168
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Rodney E. Dennis when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen Division
( Transportation Communication Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
111.
That the Kansas City Southern Railway Company
violated the agreement, particularly Rule 29, when Carman
A.G. Henderson was suspended from service for a period of
60 days.
2. That accordingly, the Kansas City Southern Railway
Company be ordered to make Carman A.G. Henderson whole
for all lost time, including the day of the
investigation, and all other negotiated benefits and
overtime he would have been entitled to."
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance of hearing
thereon.
Claimant was employed by Carrier as a Carman at its facility
in Shreveport, Louisiana. On April 30, 1991, while working on :he
Shreveport Rip Track, Claimant sustained an injury (sprained ankle)
when stopping a trackmobile. Claimant was hospitalized for a short
period and lost three days of work. On May 6, 1991, he was advised
by Carrier to be present for a formal Investigation into the
matter. That letter is quoted below:
Form 1 Award No. 12768
Page 2 Docket No. 12594
94-2-92-2-168
"Please arrange to be present in the office of
Superintendent of Cars, Kansas City Southern Railway Co.,
4601 Blanchard Road, Shreveport, LA 71107, at
9:00
a.m.,
May 16,
1991,
for a formal investigation to ascertain the
facts and determine your responsibility, if any, in
connection with an injury allegedly sustained by you on
April
30, 1991,
at the Shreveport Rip Track and in
connection with your injury proneness, as indicated by
the personal injuries allegedly sustained by you during
your employment with this Company, reports of which will
be reviewed at this investigation.
The Carrier will have as witnesses E.R. Swain, Special
Representative Car Dept., A.J. Jackson, Carman C.A.
Turner, Car Foreman, and C.H. Greig, Superintendent of
Safety."
The Investigation was held on May
30, 1991.
As a result of
that Investigation, Claimant was found to be responsible for his
injury and he was assessed a sixty-day Suspension, in a letter sent
to him on July
12, 1991.
The letter stated:
11Reference to formal investigation held May 30,
1991,
in
the Office of Superintendent of Cars, Kansas City
Southern Railway Co., 4601 Blanchard Road, Shreveport,
LA, to ascertain the facts and determine your
responsibility, if any, in connection with an injury
allegedly sustained by you on April 30,
1991,
at the
Shreveport Rip Track and in connection with your injury
proneness, as indicated by the personal injuries
allegedly sustained by you during your employment with
this Company.
After a complete review of the transcript of the
investigation, it is my determination that you are
responsible for the injury you allegedly sustained on
April
30, 1991.
This is to advise that you are being
suspended from the service of The Kansas City Southern
Railway Company for a period of sixty (60) days."
This Board has reviewed the record before it and has concluded
that Claimant received a full and fair hearing and that he was
responsible for spraining his ankle as he stepped off the track
mobile. Given this finding, it is appropriate that Claimant
receive some level of discipline and that he be put on notice
that his safety record, as outlined in the record, is not good.
Form 1 Award No. 12768
Page 3 Docket No. 12594
94-2-92-2-1f58
In issuing a sixty-day suspension, however, Carrier put
considerable "overkill" in the penalty assessment process. As this
Board has pointed out many times in the past, discipline of
employes should be instructive and, under most conditions,
progressive rather than punitive. It is this Board's opinion that
a sixty-day Suspension is arbitrary and capricious and exceedingly
punitive. Carrier can make its point in this case by assessing a
five-day Suspension with a letter to Claimant addressing his
responsibility to work safely in the future. The sixty-day
suspension shall be reduced to a five-day suspension. Claimant
shall be reimbursed for fifty-five days pay at the appropriate
straight time rate.
AWARD
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
O R D E R
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified
above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) be
made. The Carrier is ordered to make the Award effective on or
before 30 days following the postmark date the Award is transmitted
to the parties.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of November 1994.