Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No. 12859
Docket No. 12446
95-2-91-2-257
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Joseph S. Cannavo, Jr. when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen - Division of TCU
Parties to Dispute
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former
( Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company)
Statement of Claim:
Ill.
That the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company
(CSX Transportation, Inc.) (hereinafter
referred to as "carrier") violated the service
rights of Carman Helper J. Martin (hereinafter
referred to as "claimant") and the provisions
of Rules 11 and 156 of the controlling
Agreement, when on April 16 , 17 , 18 and 19 ,
1990, the carrier failed to call the claimant
to work overtime in the Fabrication Shop and
worked bona fide Carmen on Carman Helpers'
positions.
2. Accordingly, the claimant is entitled to be
compensated twenty-eight (28) hours pay at the
applicable time and one-half rate for said
violation.
Finding
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Form
1
Award No. 12859
Page 2 Docket No. 12446
95-2-91-2-257
The Organization states that :n April 16, 17, 18, and 19,
1990, the Carrier worked bonafide Carmen in the Fabrication Shop on
Carman Helpers' positions on an overtime basis thereby violating
the provisions of Rules 11 and 156 of the Shop Crafts Agreement by
utilizing bonafide Carmen to perform Carman Helpers' work. In
support of its position, the Organization directs the Board's
attention to Rules
11
and 156 of the Agreement which state in
pertinent part:
"Rule 11 -- Effective June
1,
1923.
r ,r +
(3) There will be an overtime call list (or call
board) established for the respective crafts or classes
at the various shops ...."
"Rule 156--
(a) Employes regularly assigned to help carmen and
apprentices, employes engaged in washing and scrubbing
the inside and outside of passenger coaches preparatory
to painting, removing of paint on other than passenger
cars preparatory to painting, car oilers and packers,
stock keepers (car department), operators of bolt
threaders, nut tappers, drill presses and punch and shear
operators (cutting only bar stock and scrap), holding on
rivets, striking chisel bars, side sets, and backing out
punches,using backing hammer and sledges in assisting
carmen in straightening metal parts of cars, rebrassing
of cars in connection with oilers' duties, cleaning
journals, repairing steam and air hose, assisting carmen
in erecting scaffolds, remove and apply emery wheels,
true emery wheels and grind stones, lace belting, and oil
shafting and other machinery; and all other work
generally recognized as carmen's helpers' work, shall be
classed as helpers.
(b) Carmen helpers will help carmen and carmen
apprentices to same extent as helpers help mechanics and
apprentices in other departments.
(c) They will do other work assigned to them by
their foreman, but not carmen's or apprentices' work.
Form 1 Award No. 12859
Page 3 Docket No. 12446
95-2-91-2-257
UNDERSTANDING--Negotiated February 9-22, 1922
Scaling rust and removing paint will be included
under this rule as Helpers' Work. Steam and air hose
repairing will be included under this rule as Helpers'
Work. Rebrassing of cars in connection with oilers'
duties refers to work performed in Transportation Yards.'
In furtherance of its position, the Organization states that
the Carrier cannot escape its obligation by virtue of the fact that
the Carmen were paid at the Fabrication Machine Operator's rate and
that the work therefore belongs to Carmen.
It is the Carrier's position that the provisions of the
Agreement were not violated. It states that it was required to
work employees beyond their regular tours of duty at the overtime
rate of pay to meet production demands during April 1990 and
thereby utilized the service of three Carmen during the four days
in question. The Carrier stated that the work claimed by the
Organization is not mentioned in Rule 156 and that the organization
failed to demonstrate Carmen Helper exclusive rights in support of
its claim; and that no evidence was presented by the Organization
on the property which showed a violation of Rule 11 which pertains
to distributing overtime on an equitable basis.
This Board reviewed the claim and is compelled to deny it.
The Carrier stated that the Carmen performed Fabrication Machine
Operator's work. Nothing in the record disputed or rebutted this
claim. Rule 156 does not include such work; nor does it include
"pinning and feeding material to the machines" as mentioned by the
Organization in the claim presented. The burden of proof is on the
Organization to show that Carmen Helpers have exclusive rights to
such work either by Agreement or past practice. The organization
failed to meet this burden. This Board relies on Second Division
Award 12039 wherein it was held that:
"It goes without saying that, in order to prevail in a
Claim like this, the organization must show either that
the Agreement specifically reserves the work to its
members or that the work has been performed exclusively
by its members throughout an extended period of time.
See Second Division Awards 11533 and 11535. Absent such
a showing here, this Claim must be denied."
Form 1 Award No. 12859
Page 4 Docket No. 12446
95-2-91-2-257
Even if the Organization could establish that the work claimed
belonged to Carmen Helpers by a specific Agreement provision or
systemic practice, the Agreement's construction and numerous Awards
from this Board support a premise that the journeyman mechanic
(Carman) is "master of the Craft" and as such, may be assigned to
perform all the work including work assigned to Helpers. See
Second Division Award 2959.
In accordance with this Board's findings, above, the
Organization's allegation of a Rule 11 violation is moot.
A-WARS
Claim denied.
QR D E R
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified
above, hereby orders that an Award favorable to the Claimant (s) not
be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of April 1995.