Form
1
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No. 12875
Docket No. 12631
95-2-92-2-184
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Charlotte Gold when award was rendered.
(International Brotherhood of Electrical
( Workers
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Burlington Northern Railroad
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"1. That in violation of Appendix C of the
controlling Agreement Mechanical Department
Electrician Sam Gillham of Springfield,
Missouri was deprived of compensation to which
he was entitled on July 16, 1990.
2. That accordingly, the Burlington Northern
Railroad should be instructed to compensate
Electrician Sam Gillham in the amount of 8
hours at the punitive rate. Mr. Gillham was
the first man out on the overtime board and
available to perform the service which was
denied him."
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance of hearing
thereon.
At issue in this case is the question of whether Carrier is
required to call an employee on his rest day to work overtime
(filling a position whose incumbent is on vacation) before allowing
a scheduled employee to fill the vacancy, after blanking his
position. Crane Operator Ed Shaw was on vacation July 16, 1990.
Shaw's job was assigned to Electrician Jay Luce, upon Mr. Luce's
request. This claim is raised on behalf of Electrician Sam
Gillham, who was on his rest day at the time. Mr. Luce ultimately
provided relief on four additional days of Mr. Shaw's vacation.
Form
1
Award No. 12875
Page 2 Docket No. 12631
95-2-92-2-184
The Organization cites a violation of Section 10 (b) of the
Schedule Agreement:
"(b) Where work of vacationing employees is
distributed among two or more employees, such
employees will be paid their own respective
rates. However, not more than the equivalent
of twenty-five percent of the work load of a
given vacationing employee can be distributed
among fellow employees without the hiring of a
relief worker unless a larger distribution of
the work load is agreed to by the proper local
union committee or official."
Carrier alleges that Mr. Luce had the right to perform the
work under Rule 13(a):
"(a) A vacancy of thirty (30) calendar days or less
duration in an established position (as a
result of sickness, injuries, transfers and
leaves of absence) or a new position of thirty
(30) calendar days or less duration or the
position of a vacationing employee may be
filled without bulletining by transferring the
senior qualified employee assigned in the
facility where such vacancy or position
develops requesting same. In the absence of
any such employee, the junior qualified
employee in the facility may be assigned.
The assignment of an employee to fill the
temporary vacancy shall be considered
temporary until such time as the regular
incumbent on leave or vacation returns. If
more than 30 days, it will be bulletined as a
temporary vacancy and the bulletin will
indicate the temporary -.·acancy is due to one
of the reasons listed in the above paragraph.
When the regular incumbent returns, he will
have the option of exercising seniority on any
position bulletined during his absence or
returning to the position he occupied prior to
his absence. However, if he was displaced by
a senior employee under the provisions of Rule
22 (g) during his absence, he will not be
permitted to return to his former position but
may displace a junior employee upon his
return.
Form
1
Award No. 12875
Page 3 Docket No. 12631
95-2-92-2-184
If it is necessary to call furloughed
employees other than those making requests
under Rule 23 for temporary vacancies, it is
understood that inability to accept the
proffered employment shall not constitute a
forfeiture of Seniority rights. However, in
the restoration of forces, or increase in
forces, the provisions of Rule 22 (d) shall
govern, and shall not be construed as a
`temporary vacancy' irrespective of the length
of time additional forces may be required."
Carrier points out that Mr. Luce was the senior qualified
employee requesting to relieve the vacationing employee, Mr. Shaw.
This Board has reviewed the entire record of this case and
does not read Section 10 (b) to mean that Claimant was entitled to
the relief work in question on an overtime basis before it was
given to Mr. Luce. The work of vacationing employee Shaw was not
given to an employee who was also required to perform his own
assignment. Thus, the issue of whether someone is performing 25
percent of the vacationing employee's workload does not arise. At
the same time, this rule does not mandate the utilization of an
employee on his rest day for short-term work before assigning
someone to the job who has requested the position. Rule 13 (a)
clearly states that 11...the position of a vacationing employee may
be filled without bulletining by transferring the senior qualified
employee assigned in the facility where such vacancy or position
develops requesting same." This rule does not specify that the
work must be given to the senior qualified employee requesting same
on an overtime basis.
Based upon all of the facts of the case, this claim must be
denied.
AWARD
Claim denied.
Form 1 Award No. 12875
Page
4
Docket No. 12631
95-2-92-2-184
0R D E R
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified
above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant (s) not
be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT EOARD
By Order of Second Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of April 1995.