Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No. 12954
Docket No. 12723
95-2-93-2-21

The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.


(Brotherhood Railway Carmen Division ( Transportation Communications ( International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:



FINDINGS:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.


Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.


On December 29, 1991, seven freight cars were derailed on the Carrier's property. An outside contractor was called and rerailed four of the cars with the use of four groundsmen. The three other cars were rerailed by a Car Inspector, utilizing a wreck truck.

Form 1 Award No. 12954
Page 2 Docket No. 12723


The Claim seeks pay (10 hours' punitive time and one hour straight time in lieu of meal time) for seven Carmen, whom the Organization contends should have been called to assist with the rerailing.


As its principal defense, the Carrier notes that =he Wreck Crew positions and Holmes Crane operator position (including a list of nine names) were abolished by published notice "... at the end of tour of duty Friday, November 10, 1989." There is ..^.o record shown to the Board of protest of this abolishment.


The Organization refers to Rule 47, Class if icatior of Work, which includes "... the operation and use of any other carrier equipment used in wrecking service in accordance with Rule =0."


The Carrier, however, points to the limitations of Rule which permits the utilization of outside contractors for wrecks and derailments. Section (h) reads in pertinent part as follows:



Since the Carrier abolished its "assigned wrecking orew,, zwo years earlier, the Carrier argues that there was no bass to call the Claimants to assist. In addition, the Claimants were ..^.ot members of the abolished wrecking crew in any case, and she number of Claimants and hours claimed do not appear to compor= with the facts of the incident.


In view of the acknowledged abolition of the wrecking crew, the Board finds the Carrier correct in that there is no contractual basis for required use of Carrier forces under Rule 50 ,h) and ,j) when a contractor is used.




      Claim denied.

Form 1 Award No. 12954
Page 3 Docket No. 12723
95-2-93-2-21

                          ORDER


This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant (s) not be made.


                            NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of Second Division


                            Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 18th day of September 1995.