The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr, when award was rendered.
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
As Third Party in Interest, the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers was notified of the pendency of this dispute and filed a Submission with the Board. Form 1 Award No. 12962
This is a claim for three hours' pay for a Machinist for work performed at the Juniata Back Shop. As described by the Organization, two Boilermakers "burnt steps off" a locomotive unit. The Organization contends that Machinists "have always done this work . . . of removing steps.'
The Organization presents an impressive history of its appropriate assignment to work on locomotive steps. On the other hand, the Carrier contends that, "The removal of steps in connection with repairing wreck damage has always been done by the boilermakers."
Among the many Agreements at issue here is the May 1, 1979 Memorandum of Understanding caused by the discontinuance of welding pools. This Memorandum lists various tasks and the crafts to be assigned thereto. The Carrier notes that on these lists are "Wreck Damage (excluding locomotive frames)" and "Steps," both shown as assigned to Boilermakers. The organization, on the other hand, contends this Memorandum was intended to cover welding only.
The Organization cannot be faulted in its argument as to the past performance of work on locomotive steps. Here, however, the Carrier raised a substantial point as to the use of Boilermakers in connection with wrecked locomotives.
This would be a dispute properly for resolution by a Joint Jurisdictional Committee established under the Organizations' Agreements, although it is understood that this committee has not been operative. In these circumstances, the Board is technically without authority to resolve the exact circumstances, if any, which may have made this particular assignment appropriate to other than Machinists.
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.