Form I NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No. 13099
Docket No. 13024-1
97-2-95-2-51

The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Robert L. Hicks when award was rendered.

(John V. Poll PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (


STATEMENT OF CLAI11:








FINDINGS:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
Form I Award No. 13099
Page 2 Docket No. 13024-1
97-2_95_2_51

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 193-1.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




Claimant commenced service with the Carrier on April 11, 199.1. His last day of ,ervice was .tune 8. 199.1. which started at I 1:40 P11 and ended 8:00 Aft on June 9, 1994.


Claimant argues that he had sixty days of service, thus Rule 42 was no longer applicable. The Carrier contends his application was disapproved on the 59th day which was timely and proper pursuant to Rule 42.






Form I .award No. 13099
Page 3 Docket No. 1302.1-I
97-2-95-2-51

lthough the disapproval letter of June 8, 199.1, was bare bones, it was in full accord with the language of Rule 4?. Later, while processing this dispute, Claimant was advised why his employment application was disapproved.

Under the circumstances, Carrier's action of disapproving Claimant's application for employment was timely and properly written as provided for in Rule -t2.







This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the t laimantls) not be made.

                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Second Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of January 1997.